South Africa has been in the spotlight in recent years, with some accusing Mandela's rise to power of causing the economy to regress, whites leaving, and blacks mismanaging themselves. However, this is not the case. Before the Mandela era, whites made up 22% of South Africa's population, monopolized the economy and land, and were white supremacy. After Mandela emancipated blacks, the status of whites declined, wealth was plundered, and millions of whites emigrated.
South Africa during Mandela's time underwent upheaval. Before he came to power, South Africa had more than 7 million whites in the population, who controlled the economy, industry, and land. These whites formed the economic core of South Africa, with first-class citizenship, while blacks were marginalized. After Mandela emancipated the blacks, South Africa** was gradually dominated by blacks, and the status of whites declined.
With the change of regime, blacks seized the land, enterprises, and factories of whites through the threat of force, resulting in the plundering of whites' wealth and loss of status. The safety of white life was threatened, and thousands of white farmers were attacked and assassinated by blacks. In just 10 years, at least more than 2 million whites have emigrated to Europe, the United States and other countries, resulting in a sharp decline in South Africa's foreign exchange and capital flight.
However, not all whites were able to leave South Africa. Many whites have lived in South Africa for more than five generations, losing contact with Europe and the United States, and South Africa has become their homeland. Most of those who remained were middle- and lower-class whites, lacking adequate industrial and capital support. For them, staying in South Africa is more realistic than becoming refugees or working as illegal workers abroad.
Today, white people still make up more than 7% of South Africa's total population of 59 million, or more than 4 million people. Despite the drastic reduction in numbers, they still hold large amounts of land in rural areas and become farmers. In the city, many key positions are still held by whites, albeit less than in the Mandela era.
The situation of white people has become more difficult, and the deterioration of law and order has led to the looting and assassination of many white farmers. Unable to solve the problem, white residents had to hold demonstrations, unfair treatment. However, in the total population of South Africa, these 4 million whites have less and less influence, and almost no one pays attention to their lives.
Judging by the trend, these whites may eventually have to marry blacks and be assimilated in order to survive in South Africa. Otherwise, their life situation may become increasingly difficult. What do you think about the changing situation in South Africa?Welcome to leave a message and ** the truth of this history of South Africa together!
Daily updates of fresh historical information, pay attention to history, insight into the future!
The changes in South Africa are undoubtedly a complex and serious issue. The article mentions the decline in the status of white South Africans, the plundering of wealth, and the emigration of millions of whites after Mandela came to power. This led me to think deeply about the evolution of South African society and race relations.
First, Mandela's campaign to liberate blacks was a major turning point in South Africa's history. Before he came to power, apartheid in South Africa was severe, with white people dominating. However, Mandela's rise to power brought about a seismic change in South African society, and blacks regained their rightful rights and status. This is a great act of social justice in history.
However, the achievement of justice comes with a series of problems. The article mentions that a large number of white people's land and businesses were robbed and even forcibly confiscated by blacks, resulting in the plundering of white wealth. Whether this excessive momentum is in line with the concept of reconciliation and coexistence advocated by Mandela is a question worth considering. Social change should be inclusive, not a transfer of privileges to the other.
On the other hand, the phenomenon of more than 2 million white people emigrating abroad is also a cause for concern. This is not only the result of economic and political turmoil in South Africa, but also the individual's fear of the future and the security of life. This large-scale wave of immigration has not only led to a sharp decline in South Africa's foreign exchange, but also has had a certain impact on the country's social structure and talent pool.
In the article, it is emphasized that most of the whites who remain in South Africa are middle and lower class, and lack sufficient industrial and capital support. This makes me wonder if social justice should focus more on the interests of those at the bottom to ensure that the process of change does not further exacerbate society's **. Balancing the interests of different groups in society is a serious challenge for South African society.
In the end, for those whites who remained in South Africa, the environment for survival did become more difficult. The article mentions that the deterioration of law and order has led to robberies and assassinations of white farmers,** but has not been able to respond effectively. This left white residents with no choice but to demonstrate their grievances against injustice. This social unrest is not only a threat to whites, but also a challenge to the stability of South African society as a whole.
Overall, the changes in South Africa are full of twists and turns. The social justice of the Mandela era has brought about profound change, but it has also raised a series of questions. South Africa needs to continue its efforts to achieve social harmony and stability and to promote shared prosperity among all ethnic groups.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!