Located between Egypt's Suez Canal and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the Red Sea is an important gateway for global shipping and energy**. However, as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict escalates again, the Houthis become the only force that openly supports Hamas's operations, and the Red Sea is gradually becoming a battlefield of conflict. The Houthis said they would blockade the Bab el-Mandeb Strait if Israel continued its provocations, which would mean a serious threat to Red Sea shipping and the economy.
In order to prove the value of their existence, the Houthis did not hesitate to launch attacks on Israel. They hope to prove their value to Iran and rally more support from Iran by attacking Israeli targets with impunity. If the Red Sea becomes the only spillover battlefield for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, it will cause a lot of trouble for both Israel and the United States, and more energy and resources will need to be expended.
In the Houthi attack, US Navy destroyers and merchant ships were attacked by drones and ballistic missiles. The US military selectively intercepted the drone and spared the ballistic missile, which shows that the US military cannot afford to consume and lose this person's attitude. Intercepting ballistic missiles requires expensive standard anti-aircraft anti-missile systems, and there is a possibility of failure, so the US team chooses to wait and see.
However, if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict becomes prolonged, the Red Sea will become a permanent area for the US Navy, and Houthi attacks will become the norm. This will force the U.S. military to consider the cost of protecting passing merchant ships. In addition, if the interception of low-end ballistic missiles fails, it will further spur the Houthis to take action and negatively affect the image of the US military.
The bigger trouble for the U.S. Navy is that an attack on any country's merchant ships in the Red Sea may require the help of the U.S. military. If the U.S. military does not help, it will be regarded as seeing death and not saving it. But even if it helps, there are two possibilities for success and failure. Once the Red Sea becomes an area that shipowners cannot avoid due to the lack of protection by the US military, it will have a negative impact on the shipping industry and economic development.
To sum up, the Red Sea is becoming the only battlefield for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to spill over, and the US military is mired in a war of attrition with high-tech weapons. In the face of Houthi attacks, the United States needs to consider how to fight back and protect the safety of merchant ships. The outlook for shipping in the Red Sea is not optimistic, and these issues deserve our close attention.
As one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, the Red Sea is responsible for global shipping and energy. However, as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict escalated, the Red Sea became the focus of fighting, and the Houthis did not hesitate to launch attacks on Israel, resulting in drone and ballistic missile attacks on US troops and merchant ships. In this tense situation, how do you view the choices made by the US military in the Red Sea?
First, the Houthis are becoming the only forces that openly support Hamas's fight, turning the Red Sea into a spillover battlefield for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By attacking Israeli targets, the Houthis hope to prove their presence to Iran and enlist more support from Iran. However, this has also caused a lot of trouble for Israel and the United States, which need to devote more energy and resources to deal with the situation.
Secondly, the choice of the US Navy in the Red Sea shows the attitude that they cannot afford to consume and lose this man. In the face of Houthi attacks, they selectively intercepted drones and spared ballistic missiles. There are two reasons for this choice: on the one hand, intercepting ballistic missiles requires expensive air defense systems and the possibility of failure;On the other hand, if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict continues to escalate, the deployment of the US Navy in the Red Sea will also become the norm, and Houthi attacks will no longer be the exception. In this case, the US military had to consider the price to pay for the protection of passing merchant ships. At the same time, a failure to intercept low-end ballistic missiles will further spur the Houthis to take action and have a negative impact on the image of the US military.
Finally, Red Sea shipping faces significant challenges and implications. An attack on a merchant ship of any country in the Red Sea may require the help of the US military, and the help of the US military will have a significant impact on its image. If the Red Sea becomes an area that shipowners avoid because of the lack of protection by the US military, it will have a negative impact on the shipping industry and economic development.
To sum up, the Red Sea is gradually becoming a battlefield in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and the US military is caught in a war of attrition with high-tech weapons. They need to think about how to fight back against the Houthis and keep merchant ships safe. At the same time, the outlook for shipping in the Red Sea is not optimistic. We need to closely follow the development of this situation and find sustainable solutions for humanitarian assistance and conflict resolution.