Nowadays, there is a point of view: "Increasing people does not increase land, and reducing people does not reduce land". According to this view, it is unfair to allocate land for the new population, and it is unfair to keep the existing land distribution unchanged for the reduced population. In our village, there are some families who have not received land distribution and have to rely on migrant work to make ends meet, while some families still enjoy the dividends of land even though they have only two or three people left, or even have died. This unfair distribution triggersSocialcontradictions, which need to be adjusted.
1. Does the abandoner have the right to redistribute the land?
According to the situation mentioned in the view, is it reasonable for some farmers to abandon their land for the sake of profit and now want to regain it?In my opinion, the abandoners have lost their rights to the land, and the redistribution of the land needs to take into account the rights and interests of other farmers.
2. The distribution of land after it is expropriated
When building highways in villages, someFarmersThe land was expropriated and they received compensation. But now the problem is, these areExpropriation of landofFarmersShould land be redistributed?I think they're inExpropriation of landcompensation was received, so the redistribution of the land should be carried out in accordance with the principle of fairness and justice.
3. Land allocation for the new population
The issue of the allocation of land for the new population is mentioned in the view. In some households, their population has been reduced but they still occupy large tracts of land, while some of the new population has not been allocated land. This inequity needs to be addressed in order to meet the needs of the new population.
1. Implement small adjustments
For households that have already been allocated land, part of the land can be redivided according to the equal distribution of the existing household population. For example, in the case of a declining household, they may be required to redistribute a portion of their land in order to reduce unjustified land tenure.
2. Allocation by lottery
For families who need to redistribute their land, a lottery can be used to determine the allocated plots. This ensures fairness and impartiality in distribution and prevents individual households from obtaining unreasonable land shares through other means.
3. Solve the land problem of the new population
For the new population, priority should be given to their survival needs and appropriate land allocation. This can relieve the pressure on their livelihoods and promoteRuralSustainable development of the region.
When examining the view that "increasing the number of people does not increase the land, and reducing the number of people does not reduce the land", we need to fully take into account the actual situation and the principle of fairness and justice in the distribution of land. When adjusting land distribution, we should adhere to the principles of rationality, fairness, and feasibility, and avoid inequality and injustice. Through reasonable policies and measures, we can solve the problem of unfair land distribution and promoteRuralSustainable development of the region. At the same time, we need to be clearRuralThe issue of population development, ensureRuralThe population can obtain a stable livelihood and achieve the goal of common prosperity. In the decision-making process, it is necessary to fully consider the balance of interests of all parties to ensure the feasibility and sustainability of policies.