Modern warfare no longer requires ordinary people to go to war. I believe that many people think that having more children is to protect the family and defend the country, but this is a wrong concept. For example, in recent wars, the United States has relied on the air force to bomb and ultimately won.
Neither the bombing of Iraq nor the air raids on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia were used by ordinary people on the battlefield. Therefore, future wars will not involve ordinary people on the battlefield, and victory or defeat will not depend on numbers.
Looking back on history, when the world powers invaded China at the end of the Qing Dynasty, the Manchu Qing Dynasty had the largest population, reaching about 400 million, but in the end it was still a fiasco, resulting in a decline in the living standards of its own people, and even the people's livelihood. It can be seen that the victory or defeat of the war does not depend on the number of people.
The war of the future will be a war in high-tech conditions, and there will be no need for ordinary people to go to the battlefield. Perhaps future wars will be carried out with air strikes and bombing by drones. Moreover, future wars will no longer depend on the size of the country's population.
No matter how large your country's population is, if your science and technology are not developed, your equipment is backward, and your air-space integrated strike force is weak, you can only be beaten passively and finally defeated.
Therefore, modern warfare does not require so many people to go to the battlefield, and the war of the future will be a highly modernized, air-space integrated war. Therefore, ordinary people should stop thinking about going to the battlefield to be heroes as before.
Modern warfare cannot be resolved by relying on group charges and bayonets. The army of the future is not only modernized, but also modernized.
At the same time, the country's industrial and agricultural production will also achieve a high degree of modernization, and there will no longer be a need for so many workers to engage in manual labor, nor will there be a need for so many peasants to engage in agricultural production in the fields. Therefore, overpopulation only slows down the progress of the country and the realization of modernization.
Many of the world's most populous countries are poor. In India, for example, many people at the bottom still live in slums, and many people do not have enough to eat. Therefore, it is useless to have a large population of low level and low quality.
Population is not the key to a country's strength, and in fact, the value created by those who are not well-qualified is negligible.
Many developed and wealthy countries, such as Switzerland, Sweden, Luxembourg, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Australia and Canada, are small but rich countries, proving that the wealth of a country does not lie in the number of people, but in talent and resources.
Therefore, the idea that some experts encourage fertility is completely wrong. China is not only the most populous country in the world, but also the country with the largest labor force in the world, so we need neither to increase the number of people nor to increase the labor force.
The society of the future will become more and more intelligent, and robots and artificial intelligence will replace many jobs, including in industry, agriculture and defense, so we will not have a shortage of people and labor now, and we will not lack it in the future.
If you agree with these views, please give us a thumbs up and *** update.