From the current point of view, the system of the rank of the middle is considered to be a very correct and beneficial system in the construction of a modern army. However, in the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, people's understanding of the military rank system was not sufficient, and the development of this system also experienced twists and turns. The article will take readers through the origins of the rank system, the key role that *** played in it, and the historical reasons why the rank system was abolished.
**: The founder of the middle title system.
The military rank system of New China began in 1955, and after the efforts of the people, this system has achieved initial results in just ten years. ** He has a prominent position in China's modern history, and his outstanding contributions to the army and the construction of New China are self-evident. In particular, the military rank system was implemented under his leadership.
As early as 1945, as the deputy chairman of the Military Commission, he was the chief of the General Staff, and in 1947, he took the initiative to apply for war, showing outstanding military talent in the post of commander of the Northwest Field Corps. In 1950, he served as the commander of the Volunteer Army, leading the Volunteer Army to participate in the Korean battlefield. Towards the end of the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, it was proposed that the Military Commission should take over the daily work again, and he was called upon to do so, laying the foundation for army building and system reform.
**Presiding over the work of the Military Commission: the implementation of the military rank system.
**After presiding over the work of the Central Military Commission, he deeply reflected on and summarized the actual situation of our army. In 1951, he sent a letter to *** specifically pointing out the confusion caused by the long-term non-official system to the military. Although the military rank system has a certain impact on the equality of officers and soldiers, in terms of army construction and regularized management, the military rank system is considered to be a reasonable system.
In 1953, **again sent a letter*** emphasizing that the rank system was primarily intended to determine the status and authority of each serviceman in the queue in order to exercise his or her respective duties and powers in accordance with their duties and regulations. ** In recognition of this, the implementation of the military rank system is officially on the agenda. Rank assessment began in 1954,** and played an important role in it, including the drafting of the founding marshals and generals, laying the foundation for the establishment of the army's organizational structure and rank system.
The brilliance and problems of the rank system.
However, the military rank system implemented in 1955, although it promoted the construction of the army, it was completely borrowed from the Soviet system. By the beginning of the sixties, the problem of the rank system came to the fore. The most prominent of these is the phenomenon of detachment from the masses caused by official ranks. Once some officers attained ranks, they became alienated from their subordinates and reluctant to get close to the common people. Scenes of officers working for the common people in the past have become rare.
This issue attracted the attention of ***, and in 1958 he made it clear that he was dissatisfied at an enlarged meeting of the Politburo. He emphasized that this point was similar to that of the Kuomintang, which directly exposed the flaws of the military rank system. At this time, Sino-Soviet relations deteriorated, and the system that had been borrowed from the Soviet Union was questioned, and the military rank system became the focus of criticism. In 1959, after the Lushan Conference, ** was also criticized and transferred from his post.
** Why the military rank system under the leadership was abolished.
** After being transferred from office, the discussion about the rank system did not stop. In 1964, the General Office of the Central Military Commission issued the "Circular for Soliciting Opinions on Abolishing the Military Rank System," which clearly pointed out that the military rank system of our army was copied from the Soviet Union and other countries, which did not conform to the fine traditions of our army and was not conducive to the revolutionary construction of our army. This laid the groundwork for the abolition of the rank system.
On May 22, 1965, the Standing Committee of the Third National People's Congress passed the decision to abolish the military rank system of the People's Liberation Army, which was promulgated and implemented by the then *** on the same day. Although the original proposal to abolish the military rank system caused dissatisfaction among ***, in the face of the overall trend, he finally signed and agreed. As for ***, he didn't know about the cancellation of the rank system at first, and he didn't realize the seriousness of the situation until he saw his colleagues taking off their rank markers one after another. After learning the truth, ** was saddened, after all, this system was the result of his efforts to implement, but it was suddenly canceled, ** The pain in his heart may only be understood by himself.
The lessons of history and the rebirth of the rank system.
The abolition of the rank system did not solve the fundamental problem, but made it more difficult to regularize the management of the army. It was not until 1988 that the new military rank system was re-implemented thanks to the efforts of leaders such as ***. This time, the experience of history has made people more cautious and strive to carry out reforms on the basis of inheriting the merits in order to meet the needs of the new era.
**Although the military rank system under the leadership has been abolished, its spirit and contribution to the construction of the army cannot be ignored. From this period of history, we have not only seen the changes in the system, but also the changes of an era. The rebirth of the military rank system is a lesson from history and an inevitable requirement for the modernization of national defense forces.
Epilogue. He played an important role in the development of the title system, and his contribution cannot be ignored. Although the abolition of the military rank system has caused waves, the wheel of history will not stop. By reflecting on history, we can better understand the essence of the system and find a path to adapt to the development of the times. The abolition of the military rank system is not the end, but a new starting point, allowing us to be more clear about the way forward.
The article profoundly reviews the establishment and abolition process of the middle title system, and highlights the key role of the first rank in it. This article not only makes people feel the important position of *** in modern Chinese history, but also provokes thinking about the military rank system itself and the reasons for its abolition.
First of all, the article vividly depicts the origin and development of the military rank system. By introducing the outstanding contributions of *** in the early days of the army, readers have a clearer understanding of the establishment of the military rank system. ** The achievements made by the Central Military Commission under its leadership in army building and system reform have enabled the military rank system to take shape. This part of the content gives people a more comprehensive understanding of the development of the history of the squadron, and also makes the reader have a strong interest in the topic of the article.
Secondly, the article deeply analyzes the problem of the military rank system. The phenomenon of officers detaching themselves from the masses and being unwilling to get close to the common people has attracted the attention of ***. This problem not only affected the cohesion within the army, but was also closely linked to the changes in Sino-Soviet relations at that time. By pointing out this problem, the article highlights the shortcomings of the military rank system and lays the groundwork for the subsequent abolition. The revelation of this problem gives the reader a better understanding of the background to the abolition of the rank system.
The article then details the process of abolishing the rank system. By announcing the decision to abolish the military rank system, readers learn about the process of political decision-making at that time. The article also vividly shows the huge impact of this historical event on the parties through the reaction after learning the news of the cancellation, and arouses readers' in-depth thinking about the reasons for the abolition. This part of the content adds emotional color to the article and makes it easier for people to resonate.
Finally, the article summarizes the historical experience. By pointing out that the abolition of the rank system did not solve the fundamental problem, but made management more difficult, the article hints at a reflection on history. The article mentions that the new military rank system was re-implemented in 1988, emphasizing the guiding role of historical lessons in the progress of the times. This part of the content makes readers pay more attention to the future construction of the military system while lamenting history.
In general, this article gives readers a more comprehensive understanding of this historical event through an in-depth analysis of the origin, development, problems and abolition of the Chinese title system. The essay is well-structured and informative, and provokes the reader to think about history and the military system through a vivid narrative.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!