The weather vane of the provincial examination has changed. Judging from the situation of the national examination and the provincial examination, the proposition ideas, test question types, inspection capabilities and test center design are all closely following the trend of the national examination and major changes have taken place.
First, from the perspective of proposition ideas, the provincial examination is no longer just an examination of knowledge points, but more attention is paid to the examination of candidates' comprehensive generalization ability. This means that candidates need to have stronger thinking and analytical skills, be able to think from multiple perspectives, and give comprehensive answers.
Secondly, judging from the type of exam questions, the provincial examination is gradually moving closer to the national examination. For example, the essay test has adopted similar question types and scoring standards as the national exam, which puts forward higher requirements for candidates' writing ability and problem-solving ability.
In addition, from the perspective of inspection ability, the provincial examination also pays more attention to the examination of candidates' actual work ability. For example, in some provinces, the interview process has adopted leaderless group discussions, role-plays, and other methods that are closer to the actual work scene to assess the candidates' practical work ability and team spirit.
Later, from the perspective of the design of the test center, the provincial examination is also gradually in line with the national examination. The syllabus of the examination is consistent with the syllabus of the national examination, and the content of the examination also pays more attention to the understanding and mastery of major national policies.
Therefore, candidates need to keep up with the trend of the times, constantly update their knowledge and skills, and improve their comprehensive quality and ability level.
The general knowledge test is colder and more biased, it is not easy to get a high score, and it is even more difficult to get a full score.
It is more lively and difficult to judge and examine, and it is common for the diagram to be invisible, and there are many cases where multiple rules are superimposed on a question, and the analogy is more biased towards the second-level test center, and there are more confusing options, and it is not easy to get points.
Data analysis pays more attention to the basics, and there will be big changes in the test center, which cannot be just about calculation skills, and the time for doing questions will be more tight.
The quantitative relationship tends to be simplified, and the score that can be obtained by doing the questions is higher than that by relying on Meng, and the simple questions must be learned, and the scores must be obtained.
Verbal comprehension questions are longer, sentences are more laborious to read and comprehend, and the relationships between options are intricate, and if you are not careful, you will fall into a trap.
The foundation must be refined, and the foundation must be firmly consolidated, and a solid foundation is the king.
The amount of questions should be large, and students who think that they have mastered the lifeblood of the questioner after doing 3 questions casually, please don't be too arrogant and do enough 30,000 questions to brag about.
Good at hands-on, good memory is not as good as a bad pen, difficult problems, wrong questions, good questions, please write them down!