In the past few years, the United States has never stopped encircling China, whether it is a first-class war or a science and technology war, the United States has used various means to pull Chinese companies into the so-called "blacklist" to restrict their development. However, recently, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it would remove Chengde Aoelite Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., China Second Heavy Machinery Group Co., Ltd., Ningbo Daai Laser Technology Co., Ltd., and Xinjiang Oriental Hope New Energy from the "unverified list". This sudden move has attracted people's attention, so why did the United States suddenly change its degree and let these Chinese companies go?
The "Unverified List" refers to a list of companies in the U.S. that are suspected of being involved in "restricted items or goods"**. However, these companies have not been proven to have violated the rules, and the United States has labeled them as "unwarranted" out of thin air to restrict their development. And this time, what is the purpose of the US Department of Commerce's release?While many people are skeptical of the U.S. move, believing that it is not a sincere gesture of goodwill, we need to think about it from multiple angles.
First of all, let's review the last time the Ministry of Commerce approved Chinese enterprises. At that time, it was to "pave the way" for Commerce Secretary Raimondo, but this time it seems that there is no plan to visit China, but the meaning is the same. This is the usual strategy of the United States, and they hope to bargain with China in this way, sending a warning to China: if you do not comply with my demands, I will pull you into the "blacklist". The reason for this release is also because the United States has a request for China, or that they need to negotiate with China for cooperation, so they will first come up with some "bargaining chips."
Secondly, we have to take into account that the United States is about to hold 2024**, and Biden's approval rating has been declining. To get out of the woods, Biden may want to woo China. Since taking office, Biden has taken a tough stance on China, but has not achieved any substantive results. The U.S. is currently facing a serious inflation problem and** is at risk of bankruptcy. If there is a falling out with China at this time, Biden's chances of re-election are even slimmer. After all, although China has become the fourth-largest partner of the United States, it still holds the second-largest number of U.S. bonds in the world. If we provoke China, we are likely to sell US bonds on a large scale. You know, the U.S. national debt has accumulated to $33 trillion, and it faced a fiscal deficit of $314 billion in November. Under such circumstances, neither the US Department of Commerce nor the US Treasury Department dared to offend China lightly.
To sum up, we can see the reasons why the U.S. Department of Commerce released Chinese companies. However, it should be clear that the situation is no longer in the hands of Washington alone. If the United States likes sanctions, let them sanction well, we should focus on our own development, and only a strong national strength can resist foreign intrusion. The goal we should pursue is to make ourselves stronger.
In recent years, the United States has continued to suppress Chinese companies. Whether it is through the war of ** or the war of science and technology, the United States has tried its best to limit Chinese companies to the path of development. Its purpose is obvious, that is, to maintain its hegemonic position. However, this repression is based not so much on legitimate reasons as it is on the ideological and strategic needs of the United States.
First of all, we have to mention the ** war of the United States against Chinese enterprises. War is one of the means used by the United States to protect its own domestic industry. The United States claims that China's economic development threatens their economic interests and imposes high tariffs on Chinese goods. However, in the ** war, the United States did not achieve a clear advantage. Instead, it has taken a huge toll on American consumers and businesses. U.S. businesses rely on China's cheap labor and large market, and Chinese consumers buy large quantities of U.S. goods. The complementarity of the two sides in terms of ** cannot be ignored. The war not only hurt the businesses of the two countries, but also had a serious negative impact on the global economy.
Second, the U.S. technology war against Chinese companies is also an ongoing war. The U.S. believes that the technological achievements of Chinese companies are threatening their technological leadership, and therefore seeks to contain China's development by restricting technological exchanges and cooperation. The United States has imposed a series of sanctions and suppressions on China's 5G technology, artificial intelligence, semiconductors and other fields. However, Chinese companies, with their own strength and efforts, are constantly catching up and are expected to lead in some key areas. This is extremely unsettling for the United States, as they realize that their technological superiority is being gradually surpassed by Chinese companies.
In general, the U.S. crackdown on Chinese companies is not purely based on economic interests, but more on geopolitical and ideological factors. The United States fears that China's rise will further weaken their position in the world, so it tries to contain China's development by various means. However, Chinese companies are not deterred, on the contrary, they are constantly striving to improve their own capabilities to meet the challenges. We can see that Chinese enterprises have made remarkable achievements in technological innovation and market development. The road ahead will never be easy, but we are confident that Chinese companies will be able to meet various challenges, move forward steadily, and achieve greater success.
The U.S. crackdown on Chinese companies has existed for a long time, and whether it is a first-class war or a technological war, they are trying to restrict the development of Chinese companies through various means. However, we must remain sober and recognize the real motivation behind this. In the face of challenges, we must not retreat, but stick to the bottom line and meet the challenges.
First of all, we have to believe in our own strength. Chinese enterprises have made great achievements in technological innovation and market competition, and we are capable of meeting various challenges. Our strength comes from our people, technology and market size, as long as we maintain the spirit of innovation and adapt to the needs of the market, we can overcome any difficulties.
Second, we need to maintain international cooperation. In the face of the US blockade, we can look for partners in other countries to expand the areas of cooperation and reduce our dependence on the US market. At the same time, we should also actively participate in international rule-making and international organizations to win more support for safeguarding our rights and interests.
Finally, we must steadily promote industrial upgrading. Chinese enterprises must not only be competitive in the market competition, but also have innovative capabilities and high value-added products. We can achieve leapfrog development of the industry by improving the technical level, increasing R&D investment and cultivating high-quality talents.
In short, the U.S. crackdown on Chinese companies is a long-term struggle, and we cannot be swayed by their actions. Only by maintaining confidence, sticking to the bottom line, and facing challenges can we achieve our goals and realize China's rise.