It seems that the voices of persuading us to have children have never stopped, as if the experts of a mysterious organization are constantly preaching to us the importance of childbearing.
Recently, another expert named Zheng Bingwen has emerged. Zheng Bingwen, who was the director of the Institute of American Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and the director of the World Social Security Research Center, is a prominent scholar.
Recently, in an interview with China News Weekly, he said that some young people are not as willing to have children as before due to various life pressures.
He mentioned the pressures on education, pension, medical care, childbirth, childcare, etc., as well as the overwhelm that young couples may face.
He said that he understands this very well and regrets it.
At this point, it was still reasonable, but as soon as he changed his words, the whole thing went in a strange direction:
Despite this, we young people, especially young couples, should look forward. After all, difficulties are temporary, and there is still a long way to go in a person's life. But this stage of childbirth is fleeting, seize the effective fertility period, and borrow the power of relatives and friends to help you with temporary difficulties, otherwise after this age, I am afraid it will be a little too late to regret it.
See this suggestion,My first reaction was not anger, but disappointment.
This suggestion is too unprofessional and lacks academic and technical contentAnd even six wallets are inferior, because they have not created a new term, and they seem mediocre.
The problem of raising a child, my already dead grandmother can figure out how to deal with it, and there is no need for an expert like you who specializes in social security to work.
Take 10,000 steps back and say, even if the expert has a point, everyone follows his advice.
The question is, if I ask my relatives and friends for help, who should I go to for help?
Don't they need to eat, work, have children?Just because they have money, can they help you take care of your children for free?
Even if your relatives are willing to lend you money, as the writer Zhang Jiawei said, I don't know if I understand it wrong, is this teacher talking about raising six wallets or even the power of nine clans to take on debts to support children?
Even if you want to be in debt, because of the one-child policy, most of the young people nowadays are only children, **relatives who come?
Even if there are grandparents and grandparents, haven't they already emptied their six wallets?There are too many specialists, can relatives still meet the needs?
What's more, it wasn't said before".Only give birth to one, xx to provide for the elderly"What?The slogans on the rural walls haven't been erased for too long, and everyone still remembers them.
Now there is such a doctoral supervisor who specializes in social security and welfare, enjoys the best special allowance, takes taxpayers' money, and has studied for most of his life, and he has come to the conclusion that it is difficult to have a child and ask relatives and friends for help, don't you feel embarrassed?
Since having a child is a personal matter, and the responsibility and cost must be passed on to relatives and friends, what this expert means is that whether to have a child or not has nothing to do with the country.
In this case, whether people want to have children or not has nothing to do with others, and this expert does not have to give his own advice.
Taxpayers pay for the so-called experts, not for them to make irresponsible remarks about personal matters.
It is irresponsible to say that the issue of having and raising children, which requires the participation of the whole society and needs to be guaranteed by the medical care, education, pension, welfare system, etc., and which has a bearing on the national economy and people's livelihood, is a temporary difficulty that can be solved by seeking help from relatives and friends, and it is irresponsible, and it has also lost its identity as an expert.
Science and technology ** recently posted on Weibo that the latest research found that having two children is the most conducive to longevity, and the fewer or more children will shorten the life expectancy.
Someone commented on this: ".Sincerely ask people to do things, don't mention two cigarettes, carry a bottle of wine or something?Drawing only two pies is a scam. ”
It can be seen that now we have not even done a good job of fooling the masses
No wonder some people say that when the living environment becomes harsh, animals will automatically stop reproducing. Why do some people think that humans are the opposite?
To put it bluntly, they just saw the reality clearly and understood the truth.
Someone said it well: ".The philosophical implication of negative population growth is that the current social life is denied by the vast majority of people.
This kind of negation, without self-realization, without reminder, it just happens so naturally. Not giving birth is a kind of silent dissatisfaction.
If there is no collective appeal to the collective solution to the plight of the individual, why can't the expert make some practical recommendations?
For example, why not try swapping to raise a child?In this way, the cost of raising a child is naturally greatly reduced, and young couples will be able to afford to have children and raise children.
Just like the ancients had a proverb: "Yi Zi eats", and today there is "Yi Zi and raises". This contrast is more intense and more harmonious.
Such a proposal is at least of some value, some of its feasibility, and not so humiliating.
What do you think?
Autumn and Winter Check-in Challenge