U.S. spokesman Matthew Miller recently stressed that the U.S. hopes that Israel will strictly abide by humanitarian law when using its arms aid.
However, the recent actions of the United States ** do not correspond to this.
Allegedly, the United States bypassed Congress last week and sent emergency arms directly to the Israeli military, claiming that it was to protect the interests of the United States, adopted a series of means of self-defense and needed immediate ammunition.
This act has been accused of conniving at Israel's more aggressive actions and contradicting the United States***'s professed position of "upholding humanitarian law and avoiding harm to civilians".
This move by the United States has raised questions about its ethical standards in handling international affairs.
In addition, many countries and organizations believe that the United States' provision of emergency arms sales to Israel is irresponsible, which would increase tensions in the Middle East and could further undermine peace and stability in the region.
Some international observers have pointed out that the United States is acting out of self-interest and trying to maintain its position and influence in the Middle East by supporting Israel.
Originally, the United States, as a third-party country, had the responsibility to promote the peaceful settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
However, in this conflict, the performance of the United States** has been disappointing.
On the one hand, the United States has verbally expressed its support for the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks and called for a ceasefire, but on the other hand, it has increased its military presence in the conflict zone and has shown actions that do not correspond to its words.
This contradiction not only makes the "intermediary" role of the United States in the Middle East more vulnerable, but also leads to more civilians.
In the support operations behind the conflict, the United States has failed to effectively counterbalance Israel's military actions, which have instead increased tensions in the conflict.
Thanks to strong support from the United States, Israel has used a range of high technologies** in the conflict.
This makes the United States a certain degree of conflict.
This excessive support not only violates the principles of human rights and justice that the United States has always flaunted, but also exacerbates the instability in the Middle East.
At a time when the United States is being questioned at home and abroad, it is urgent for the United States to review its policy position on the Middle East.
If the United States truly wants to be an agent of peace, it must be clear and unwavering in its actions, not just in words.
Only in this way can we open up a truly feasible path and make real efforts to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.