In the world of cinema, laughter is the most magical note, which can connect the emotions of the audience and make people laugh on set. Sometimes, however, a movie that is advertised as a comedy does not cause the audience to laugh, but instead makes people wonder: what kind of comedy is this?Today we will ** is a controversial movie, the Sunshine Robbers.
New Chapter:
Comedy, a field that is supposed to make people laugh, is full of helplessness and confusion at some point. Jia Ling, who was once known as the "new comedy queen", won 5.4 billion box office in "That My Dearest Stranger", while at the same time, the former comedy queen Ma Li suffered a miserable defeat.
This May Day, the film market can be described as a crowd of heroes, from the national teacher Zhang Yimou's "On the Cliff" to the childlike "Pig Man", covering 10 movies of various themes. However, in this competition of thousands of troops, "Sunshine Robbers" was "dissuaded" by the market early.
The movie was released for three days, with a box office of only 22.43 million, the film schedule gradually decreased, and the word of mouth plummeted, becoming the worst box office leader on May Day. This seems to be a portentful omen, and Ma Li has become a victim of this comedic brutal battle.
As an adaptation of Kotaro Isaka**'s "Sunshine Robbers", it was supposed to be a whimsical urban fairy tale, however, the audience was brought into a painful and torturous story. Director Li Yu poured a lot of cinematography into it, with rich colors and symmetrical images, but it failed to hide the lack of content.
The film claims to be a "comedy", but viewers find that the laughs in it are like beef in beef noodles, with pitiful few. The laughter stays at the level of ancient aesthetics, and the comedy skills seem naïve and embarrassing. The audience was expecting laughter inside the cinema, only to get nearly two hours of dazed and bored.
What's even more suffocating is that the plot design is absurd. Starting from the protagonist Xiaoxue's loss of her daughter Nana, the movie enters a boring cycle of snatching and returning again and again. The motives of the characters are even more ridiculous, as if they are a strange force in the city.
In terms of lines, director Li Yu pursued too much depth, and a large number of dialogues filled the entire film, but failed to improve the quality of the film. The audience expressed their helplessness about this movie, some chose to sleep, some played with their mobile phones, and the whole set was filled with boredom and dissatisfaction.
In the failure of this film, Ma Li's performance was also criticized. She tries to turn male identity into a selling point, but it comes across as greasy and contrived to the audience. Audiences prefer the optimism and boldness she showed in "Charlotte's Troubles" and "Iron Fist of Shame" to the "manliness" imposed in "Sunshine Robbers".
Conclusion: The movie world is like a noisy feast, and laughter is the most wonderful. However, "Sunshine Robbers" failed to play this symphony of comedy, but instead immersed the audience in boredom and confusion. Perhaps, the failure of this film will become a mirror in the creation of comedy films, making people reflect on what is real comedy and what is a laugh that moves the audience.
In the world of cinema, the focus is often on works that bring pleasure, emotion or inspiration, and sometimes stories outside of the film can arouse great interest. This article not only discusses the development and challenges of comedy films, but also about the controversy and impact caused by Stephen Chow in this field.
Comedy has a unique place in the film industry, but this light-hearted genre has been caught in a special kind of controversy because of Stephen Chow. Under his influence, comedy films seem to have been divided into two camps, sparking divisions between audiences and industry insiders. But it's worth noting that it's not a simple matter of liking and hating, but a different view of the film's aesthetics and expression.
Stephen Chow's comedic style is considered a classic by some, while others take it with a grain of salt. This controversy exists not only among the audience, but also among the industry insiders. Behind this phenomenon is a different perception of the concept of comedy films and a preference for film style.
In a past variety show, a controversy came into focus. The collision of the two comedians sparked heated discussions on the Internet, accompanied by thoughts and discussions about Stephen Chow. In the midst of this controversy and attention, Xu Juncong's new film "Big Talk God Catch" was quietly launched, however, the film encountered a different response than expected.
As many people expected, the movie "Big Talk" did not gain widespread recognition from the audience after it was launched. Despite being different from the audience's expectations, the film did not receive the desired reviews in terms of word-of-mouth. This result is also related to the "tribute" to Stephen Chow in the title and content of the film to a certain extent.
However, the poor reviews of the film are not the only bright spot. The storyline and presentation have also raised many questions. The plot routine and joke design seem to lack novelty, and the baggage and style similar to Stephen Chow have caused a lot of disgust among the audience. In this movie, although there are professional comedy characters involved, the unexpected laughter falls on an Internet celebrity named "Brother Hua Zi".
This movie failed to achieve the desired effect in the hearts of the audience, and even seemed unnatural because of the "tribute" to Stephen Chow, which seemed to be a little too deliberate in pursuing association. The joke design and story direction in the movie also failed to impress the audience, let alone reach the level that a comedy film should have.
In short, this article will delve into the two sides of the ** comedy movie under the influence of Stephen Chow, as well as the many controversies caused by the newly launched "Big Talk God Hunt" among the audience. For comedy films, laughter and plot design are crucial, however, this film has failed to achieve satisfactory results in these aspects.