Chatting between comrades-in-arms, I heard that some leaders mobilized retired personnel to choose month by month, and when no one chooses, they blame everyone for not obeying the guidance and persuasion of the organization, but can you really blame everyone if you don't choose month by month?
As a mainstream battalion cadre of retired cadres, the monthly retirement pension is about more than 7,000, and if you pay medical insurance for the elderly, there is a high probability that there will be more than 5,000 left. This income is compared with the localities, not to mention the developed coastal areas, not to mention the big cities in the interior, not to mention the monthly salary, the provident fund, performance, spiritual civilization award, car allowance, and occupational annuity alone add up to about this amount. If you can retire after a few more years, the treatment is very different from month to month. Cadres are not stupid in the unit, who will not settle accounts!Thinking about it, compared with the two paths of placement and retirement, month-by-month is the worst option, and naturally no one cares about it.
There are also many bars who say that if you find a job month by month, wouldn't it be good to have two incomes?At this point, you ask the local staff to ask them to quit their jobs when they are 40 years old, and only take the basic salary to go to the society for reemployment, and you see how many will go.
Therefore, instead of putting your future life in uncertainty, it is more scientific and reasonable to choose placement or retirement, which is the reason why there are few candidates month by month