Recently, British expert Richard Godfrey claimed that he had found a new location for Malaysia Airlines MH370 through the new technology WSPRNET, located in the deep sea of the Indian Ocean, 1,993 kilometers west of Perth, Australia, 4,000 meters below the seabed. The news attracted widespread attention, but there were some unexpected voices on the Weibo of the Chinese family of the missing passenger of MH370.
The new coordinates** raise doubts.
Despite British experts' claims to have found the new location of MH370, some of the families of the missing MH370 passengers have called for not believing the news, stressing that technology is no longer the only obstacle to finding out the truth. The family pointed out that the key lies in the attitude of each country, which makes people think about the veracity of news reports and the credibility of experts' claims.
Analysis of new technologies.
Richard Godfrey introduced his use of WSPRNet technology, which is processed in real time via radio wave data and dates back to 2008, providing a new way to find the MH370. Based on the principle of radio wave propagation, this technology utilizes WSPR software, developed by Joe Taylor in 2008, to enable radio amateurs around the world to propagate signals and record location information on specific radio bands.
Technical reliability and doubts.
Despite the seemingly rigorous approach of British experts, there are few successful cases of finding the MH370. The location identified this time is 28 kilometers away from what the Ocean Infinity team searched for in 2018, raising questions about this new discovery. In addition, the complex topography of the seabed also makes it difficult to detect, and high-end submersibles are required to conduct in-depth searches.
Reproach to the captain.
Richard Godfrey said on the show that MH370 captain Zahari Ahmed was responsible for the disappearance of the plane, suggesting that it may have been hijacked by the captain. The remark attracted more attention, but it also led to different interpretations of the captain's motives.
The family called on the global academic community to participate in the discussion.
Faced with the new theory of searching for MH370, the family members of Malaysia Airlines MH370 called on the global academic community to discuss and review the new technology, stressing that the search must continue. They watched with concern to see if the Malaysian authorities would agree to further searches.
Conclusion: The journey in search of the truth.
With the new discovery of British experts, the mystery about MH370 has once again attracted widespread attention. The use of new technologies offers new possibilities for finding the truth, but doubts and unknowns remain. Malaysia Airlines MH370's families, experts and the world** are looking forward to a new breakthrough to solve this 7-year-old mystery. In any case, the search for MH370 continues.
In Search of MH370: A New Breakthrough in the Mists of Truth
Recently, British expert Richard Godfrey claimed to have found a new location for Malaysia Airlines MH370 through the new technology WSPRNET, which has attracted widespread attention. This discovery has reignited the debate about MH370's disappearance, but should we accept the news in its entirety?
First of all, the application of the new technology WSPRNet provides new possibilities for finding lost aircraft. Through a combined analysis of satellite data, Boeing data, ocean drift data, and WSPRNET radio wave data, experts claim that MH370 may have crashed at a specific location in the Indian Ocean. This technology is unique in that it is able to process and record radio wave data in real time, forming a global network that provides more clues for the search for missing aircraft. This innovative approach is truly inspiring and gives a glimmer of hope to families and the world.
However, we should not take this new discovery lightly. First of all, there have been many failures in the search for MH370, and although the new technology has made certain breakthroughs, it does not guarantee 100% accuracy. Secondly, the location identified by experts is 28 kilometers away from the previous search team, which raises questions about the new findings. Whether this is a technical problem or a data problem needs to be further verified.
It is worth noting that the families of the missing passengers called on Weibo not to be misled by the news, emphasizing that technology is no longer the only obstacle to finding the truth, but more importantly, the attitude of countries. This raises concerns that the discovery of new technologies will be difficult to verify if they are unwilling to cooperate with further searches.
In addition, the blame of the captain by experts has caused some controversy. Although Richard Godfrey claims that the captain is responsible for the disappearance of MH370, this is only a personal speculation and is not supported by conclusive evidence. Whether the accusation against the captain is premature and far-fetched is also a question that needs to be carefully considered.
Overall, the search for MH370 is still fraught with unknowns and challenges. The emergence of new technologies undoubtedly provides a glimmer of hope for us to find the truth, but we still need to look at it rationally and work together globally under the premise of science and transparency to unravel this mystery. At the same time, active cooperation in this process is crucial, and only by the joint efforts of all parties can it be hoped that the true whereabouts of the missing aircraft will be found. The disappearance of MH370 is like a heavy puzzle, and we look forward to revealing the truth.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!