In this Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the tone set by all the mainstream of the West is that Palestinian Hamas, which occupies the Gaza Strip, launched a surprise attack on Israel on October 7.
During the attack, Hamas forces kidnapped two or three hundred Israeli civilians, which is an important basis for Hamas's attack to be characterized as terrorism by many Western leaders.
If Hamas doesn't do it authentically in terms of behavior alone, isn't there a saying here: there is a wronged head, and the debtor has the owner!Whoever provokes you, who you go to settle accounts with, and kidnap civilians really can't be on the table.
But there is a question here, so let's not dwell on what all the people are soldiers, let's just say that Israeli civilians and Israeli troops are part of the general category of Israelis?There should be no doubt about that, it certainly is.
Speaking of which, some people may say that according to the rules of war, the exchange of troops between two countries is a fight between the army and the army, and it is a violation of the law to attack civilians.
It seems that this is the reason, when the princes fought before the Spring and Autumn Period here, it was quite well-behaved. If one side is defeated, the victorious side will not only not chase and kill them all, let alone hurt civilians, and will have to compensate the injured of the other party another day, and said shyly: Oh, I'm sorry, my hands are heavy, my hands are heavy.
The main reason why this method of warfare can last for a long period of time is that the participants in these wars are also the makers of the rules of war, based on the fact that they have a certain blood relationship far or near, and they will kill each other as soon as they come up, and this time they may be able to kill the other party, but if they do so, the boomerang will definitely fall on their heads in the end. Therefore, in the formulation of the rules of war, it is possible to distinguish between the superior and the inferior, and if there is a winner or loser, it is almost a win, which is much more civilized than the barbaric killing between humans earlier, and it is all from that time, which is too scary.
Although human instinct is a mode of mutual harm, but they all have good ideas, so they do everything possible to try to standardize good ideas with some means and rules, our historical chariots rushing against each other, Europe's queue shooting, the Geneva Conventions, and even today's prohibition of chemical **, INF Treaty, etc., are all the products of at least moral standardization of rules.
However, if human beings follow the rules in this way, it is difficult to say whether human beings are in an atomic state, at least it is impossible to become a mammal that will not be exterminated. You can think of this as follows the rules, and you die quickly.
Song Xianggong and even the Song Kingdom were ridiculed and ridiculed by successive dynasties, and the typical label on his body was "stupid pig-style benevolence, righteousness and morality". In the battle of Hongshui with the Chu State, Song Xianggong, who followed the rules, not only basically lost all his assets, but also became the laughing stock of later generations.
What did Song Xianggong do wrong?After thinking about it carefully, it seems that there is no such thing, but the other princes have long stopped talking about martial virtues, and Song Xianggong has become a typical victim.
So the question is, what is the basis of the rules?It's not that complicated to say, it's just that what you do to me, I'll do to you. At best, it is said that "the grace of a drop of water should be reciprocated by a spring", on the contrary, it is "to treat others in their own way", and then in layman's terms, it is more scoundrel than scoundrel, and to deal with hooligans is more hooligan than hooligan, otherwise, any rules are just a tool to restrict honest people.
Let's look at the Palestinian-Israeli conflict from here.
Who really owns this piece of land in Palestine?There is no point in citeing the scriptures to find the roots, and if you toss in such a way, whether it is the English, or the Ottomans, or any other people who are still alive today, will have reason to claim sovereignty!There is only one way to decide the ownership of this land, and that is: I'm here, no one wants to drive me away!
As Palestinians who have lived on this land for 2,000 years, there are certainly good reasons to own this land. As for what UN Resolution 181 is, it is not incomprehensible that they consider it unfair or even illegal. As for why, there is no need to explain too much at all, if you have the strength, the three words "why" are enough.
Of course, this is called breaking the rules, but all the rules in human history can be said to be used to break, especially the rules that others set for you.
Israel relied on this rule to build a state, and whether it is reasonable or unreasonable is a fait accompli, after all, other Middle Eastern countries have failed to reach out and come in, and this is the only way to defeat them.
The next step is Israel's indulging, and of course the word aggression has never been used in the course of Israel's encroachment on Palestinian land, and it is a frequent occurrence of another word, "settlement".
Settlements" are what appear to be non-military means of encouraging Israeli civilians to live on Palestinian land. The Israeli army has established a separation zone for settlements on the grounds of protecting Israeli civilians.
This de facto aggression is thus diluted by the high-sounding name of "settlements", and when the news shows Palestinians attacking Israeli "settlements", onlookers often mistakenly believe that the Palestinians have attacked the so-called Israeli territory and that they are deliberately targeting civilians.
Now if the Palestinians do not rise up and regain their land, then they will only end up in two ways, either they will be swallowed up all their land and eventually assimilated by Israel, and they will be second-class citizens for a long time;Either they will be driven out of Palestine and wander around the world, like the Gypsies, Kurds, or former Israelis.
Suddenly, I remembered the puppet Manchukuo, Hong Kong, Macao ......, they are back, not because of some kind of rules, but because rules can only be in the hands of the strong. Reason with the hooligan, the hooligan will only go up and down, and only by chopping off his tools of crime will he not scream and become soft-spoken.