You can't let AI take over.
The full text is 1145 words, and it takes about 2 minutes to read
Written by Beijing News Commentator Chi Daohua Edited by Ma Xiaolong Proofread by Li Lijun.
Data map. Fig. ic photo
In the past, writing a year-end summary report was a headache for many people. Now, the application of AI seems to have made this process more efficient and easy.
According to Red Star News, recently, a recruitment notice of a company in Wuhan in the circle of friends has attracted attention. With the blessing of AI, the company's manpower has been reduced by 10%-20%, but the number of orders received has increased by 20%-30% compared with the same period last year. Towards the end of the year, some monthly sales even reached more than 60,000 orders. At the same time, some people see a "shortcut" from it, and it can be seen in the report that when they learn that the year-end summary on ** is AI**, some people choose to refund the order and use AI to generate text by themselves.
The year-end summary of AI, which promotes the company's cost reduction and efficiency increase, seems to be the full use of AI, but it is very easy to make the year-end summary, which should be a very "personal" manuscript, become more and more a formality, and in fact it is not conducive to the growth and development of the personal workplace.
Using AI**, or inviting the company**, all reflect that the year-end summary is regarded as a burden in the workplace to some extent. In the past, similar personal summary manuscripts may also have to consider factors such as cost and confidentiality, but with the increasing maturity and widespread application of AI technology, in the future, AI** may become a "tacit" operation method for many professionals.
To this end, it is necessary to make it clear that the writing of manuscripts such as year-end summaries and debriefing reports is a review of the gains and losses of an individual's work in the past period and a prospect for future development. Although in most cases, it is arranged by the unit, but for each professional, it is also an opportunity to sum up experience, find shortcomings, and plan for the future.
In this process, AI may help refine the text as an assistant for searching for materials, building structures, and enriching vocabulary, but in the end, it is only a "tool" role, not a "subject" of writing. Otherwise, there is a suspicion of putting the cart before the horse.
The work is summarized into AI works, which means that there is no personal color, no emotional investment, and a bunch of "one-size-fits-all" big words and clichés. In this way, similar manuscripts lose the original purpose of writing, and become meaningless wordplay for both the organization and the individual.
Moreover, in the context of the workplace, this is also to transfer personal work tasks to AI, and push a thinking experience process that needs to be sorted out, Xi, analyzed, and reflected, all to external forces, so that AI can complete the task in a few minutes, seemingly "complete" to complete the task, it is inevitable to fall into the trap of formalism, and it is difficult to get rid of the suspicion of "laziness and coping".
It can be said that it is not smart to play such a routine in the workplace. This is also as some people engaged in human resources worry that the popularity of AI ** will make employees Xi to choose to use formatted documents to cope with work, "more and more distracted in the future".
Therefore, for people in the workplace, from their own long-term development plan, do not let AI dominate, complete their own work in a down-to-earth manner, and take their work seriously, can individuals achieve real growth and walk more steadily and solidly in the workplace.