Last week, at the initiative of the Wuhan Housing Association, eight local real estate projects launched the "30-day no reason to check out" activity, that is, by the end of this year, buyers who participated in the subscription can "regret" once. Is "no reason to check out" really "no reason" okay?Does it have any effect on the improvement of the market?
As early as 2008, during the downturn in the property market, many domestic developers made similar commitments, and in 2015, Evergrande Real Estate even included all its residential properties in the country into the ranks of "no reason to check out". In the eyes of buyers, once the contract is signed, it is difficult to check out and return the deposit, which is the biggest "pain point" that leads to frequent real estate disputes, and the developer's commitment to "check out for no reason" is equivalent to giving buyers a "reassurance" and setting a "cooling-off period" for buying a house. During this "cooling-off period", buyers can carefully consider whether I can afford to repay the loan every month, what is the reputation of the quality of this real estate, or whether there are better options around, so as to avoid losses due to impulse.
However, it is strange that although there have been "no reason to check out" properties in many cities, including Nanjing, there are very few cases where "no reason to check out" has actually been completed. Some people may say that in the past, house prices have been rising, and buyers usually do not choose to check out if it is not for emergencies, but the reality is that once a buyer chooses to check out, there are more "reasons" on the developer's side. As a simple example, there was a couple of buyers in Shanghai who paid a deposit of 100,000 yuan to buy a ** set of ** intended to be used as a wedding house, and the developer told the two that if they were not satisfied within three months, they could check out. As a result, more than a month later, the two broke up, and applied for "no reason to check out", but the developer said that the house payment they paid did not reach 30% of the total house price, and did not meet the conditions of "no reason to check out", if you have to return, but you must pay 10% of the liquidated damages, so the two parties went to court.
Even if some real estate agrees to check out, the payment process is far beyond the limit of the buyers' patience, a delay of more than half a year, the payment has become an installment, and so on to get back the full amount of the purchase price, I don't know the year of the monkey, so, some people joke that you must not tell the developer the reason when you check out, once it is said, "no reason" becomes "there is a reason", and the developer will naturally not agree to you to check out.
Jokes aside, is the so-called "no reason to check out" a pie or a trap?In my opinion, this is actually a rather helpless way, now the property market sales are sluggish, can think of the tricks have come out, in addition to not a significant price reduction, what to send decoration, send home appliances, official subsidies for house purchases, etc., it seems that the effect is not obvious, real estate companies have to use the tricks used before again, hoping to boost the confidence of buyers. At present, the majority of buyers are most worried about the trend of housing prices and whether they can be delivered, and "no reason to check out" has little to do with these two core issues, so in order to let buyers rest assured, only by establishing a more sound and more secure real estate market, can we truly stabilize market confidence.
Curator: Li Jun.
Co-ordinator: Yin Xiaoping.
Cinematographer: Li Mingzhe.
Design: Dong Lin.
Packaging: Tang Jiayu.
Fan inscription: Zhang Tianyi.
Copywriting Appearance Editing: Ma Zuobo.
Proofreading: Sheng Yuanyuan.