The United States Revealed Its Fierce Appearance, and the Real Contest Began Seven Missile Brigades

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-01-30

In this era of rapid technological development, when the United States turned off the GPS signal in the Yemen region, it seemed that this should be an invisible sword to deter missile attacks. However, reality shows us how unusual the Houthis are in Yemen. Among the types of missiles they are equipped with, the Persian Gulf-2 anti-ship ballistic missile does not rely on GPS systems, but uses advanced technologies such as GLONASS codes, infrared imaging and semi-active laser guidance. This autonomous, fearless nature makes the United States shutting down the GPS system like a crown for a monkey.

If it wants to truly suppress Yemen's Houthis, it seems that the US military will need to resort to a more extreme means – launching lightning strikes. However, this is not an easy task. The difficulty of accessing airspace has put the United States in a tricky situation, and Yemen's Houthi rebels have a variety of anti-aircraft missile systems, making it difficult for U.S. drones to carry out their missions in their airspace. Even a variety of advanced fighters, such as Tornado fighters and F-15 fighters, were shot down in the Yemen war, demonstrating the strong anti-air strike capability of Yemen's Houthi forces.

If the U.S. military wants to win in this field full of defense mechanisms, it may need to consider using advanced ** such as the LRASM stealth cruise missile. However, this is not an absolute solution to the problem. Yemen's Houthi armed forces have seven anti-aircraft missile brigades, armed with a wide range of advanced anti-aircraft missiles from Russia and Iran. With high costs and a well-defended enemy, the U.S. military will face daunting challenges in this war.

Behind this war, however, lies a much more complex dimension. Yemen's Houthi rebels have succeeded in holding Israel's economic lifeblood in their hands by cutting off the Red Sea line. Israel, a country heavily dependent on imports and exports, is under tremendous pressure. In 2022, Israel's total imports and exports reached more than $170 billion per year, and the severance of the Red Sea ** line undoubtedly dealt a heavy blow to its international **. At the same time, Yemen's Houthi rebels skillfully dispelled Israel's military operations in Gaza by attacking Red Sea freighters, providing valuable support to Hamas, making it difficult for Israel to play the game.

Throughout the Middle East, Israel is surrounded by Muslim countries, creating a strategic disadvantage. Despite the absolute military superiority in Gaza, this is only a tactical manifestation. In the long run, Israel may face even greater difficulties in the region. From North Africa to the Middle East, to East Africa and Central Asia, almost all of them are Muslim countries, while Israel is relatively small. In this kind of siege, if Israel wants to break out of the dilemma of being alone, it needs more flexible strategies and deeper thinking.

Despite Israel's knack for quick fixes, the war has clearly put them to the test. The protracted war of attrition has made it difficult for Israel's economy and national strength to last, and Yemen's Houthi rebels have skillfully used the strategic advantage of the Red Sea line to put Israel in a difficult situation. In the Middle East, the United States seems unable to effectively contain the Houthis in Yemen, making Saudi Arabia and other countries its defeats. Under such pressure, Israel's course of action and how to deal with its strategic dilemma have become serious issues before it.

As the Sino-Indian border issue continues to be tense, both countries have stationed 100,000 troops, which has aroused widespread concern. While the two sides are expected to withdraw their troops quickly to avoid a potential conflict, this scenario is not an easy scenario to achieve. The China-India border issue involves complex and sensitive regional interests and historical entanglements, and political mutual trust and effective dialogue are needed before it can be resolved.

The Philippines, one of the major parties to the South China Sea dispute, chose not to take action for the time being for fear of further deterioration of the situation. In response to North Korea's missile test, China said it sought stability and called on all parties to exercise restraint. In the face of missile tests that could threaten the security of the U.S. homeland, China has engaged in dialogue and mediation in an attempt to ease tensions.

India needs to be more proactive in dialogue to avoid further escalation of the conflict. Rebuilding political trust is key to solving this problem. The two sides should adhere to the proper handling of disputes through diplomatic channels, and try to avoid taking unnecessary actions such as provocative acts or carrying **.

Related Pages