The small statue of Huan Monument is funny and frequent, and the pseudo-poems are fictional and plastic.
Cao Zhan begged for wine and did nothing, and Hu Shi followed the fake to the truth.
Bold humming also becomes a rhyme, and the hypocritical bastard is self-proclaimed.
Experts learn He Xuanhe, and he is mixed and stirred.
Since the 50s of the last century, relevant "experts" have set up a special research team to go to all parts of the country to find Cao Xueqin's tomb.
What is good at the top will be very bad at the bottom. As a result, all kinds of Cao Xueqin's relics and relics came out 200 years after Cao Zhan's death. All wishes come true, and good is great.
Cao Xueqin's tombstone stone.
In 1968, a farmer in Tongzhou, Beijing, accidentally dug up a stone tablet while farming. When the experts heard the news, it turned out that this was the epitaph of Cao Xueqin, who they had been looking for for more than 20 years.
Experts excavated the area for several miles. However, after several days of continuous excavation, Cao Xueqin's tomb was never found.
2.A small statue of Cao Xueqin.
Zhou Ruchang's "Identification of Small Statues of Xueqin":
Two small statues of Cao Xueqin have been discovered, and commentators believe that each has its own problems. This article is a test to add a discernment.
The first biography was painted by Wang Gang and has been circulated for a long time. Hu Shi published an article in 1961 denying that the portrait was Cao Xueqin, without any specific argument, only saying that the inscription poems at the back of the painting did not look like they were for Cao Xueqin, but a portrait of another "Hanlin" in the Qianlong era whose surname was "Xueqin". Mr. Wu Shichang once wrote an article to refute it. Later, I also came across the article "Interpretation of Cao Xueqin's Small Portrait" written by Mr. Zhu Nanmi, and he also tended to affirm the reliability of the portrait. I would have agreed with Mr. Wu and Mr. Zhu. The main reason is that we have never heard of Cao Xueqin at the same time (or even successively) as Cao Xueqin, and there is a person named "Xueqin", whether it is "Hanlin" or other literati and bureaucrats.
Later, I turned to skepticism. Because, Wang Gang is the son of Wang Ruizhang, a Shanghai Baoshan engraver, and Ruizhang is called "Xuecen". His Qianlong five-year preface publication "Drunken Love Residence Seal Reward", that is, self-signed "Xuecen Old Man". So is there a possibility that this is like the music picture made by Wang Gang or others for Wang Xuecen, and it has been falsely rumored or changed to the word "Xueqin"? This possibility cannot be overestimated. Of course, there are other suspicious points. However, it is not possible to make a definitive judgment until the original is available. I don't want to draw conclusions about this at this time.
The second was painted by Lu Houxin and found in the Henan Provincial Museum in Zhengzhou. The artist's inscription reads "Mr. Xueqin". However, it is precisely because all the inscriptions do not include the surnames of the characters, so some people suspect that this "Mr. Xueqin" is not surnamed Cao, but a "Mr. Xueqin" who does not know "who is the surname".
In this way, just thirty years before Qianlong, there were "three" people with the word "Xueqin" at the same time, and two of them left portraits that happened to be not surnamed Cao. -- What a coincidence.
The reason for denying that Lu Hua is Cao Xueqin is only that there are two inscriptions by Yin Jishan on the opposite page of this painting in the album, and these two poems are titled "Yu Chujiangzhao" in the ninth volume of the publication "Yin Wenduangong Poetry Collection". Therefore, some people even came to the conclusion that the painting was Yu Chujiang's "Yu Xueqin", not Cao Xueqin.
But this view is really debatable....
3.Cao Xueqin's "inscription wall poem".
In April 1971, in the West Xuan of Zhengbai Banner No. 39 at the mouth of the ditch in Tibet, the owner here found an inscription on the peeling wall, in which the inscription reads: "The rich and the poor are intersected with each other by courtesy, and there is little in the world; Estranged relatives and slow friends because of wealth and scattered in the world", after research, it was written by Cao Xueqin that year, and the history, structure, and layout of the surrounding houses were in line with the actual living situation of Cao Xueqin that year, so it was built here as Cao Xueqin's former residence.
I have to sigh at the otherworldliness of the imagination of the "red scientists"!
4."Cao Xueqin's poems".
Liu Mengxi, "Dream of Red Mansions and a Hundred Years of China":
Cao Xueqin can write poems, but in addition to "Dream of Red Mansions", there is no complete Cao Xueqin's poems circulating, only the two broken sentences in the inscription of Duncheng's "The Legend of Pipa Xing" "Bai Fu Shiling should be very happy, and it must be called a barbarian ghost pomp". Around 1973, Cao Xueqin's poem "The Legend of Pipa Xing" suddenly appeared, and in 1974, Shanghai People's Publishing House compiled and printed "Research Materials on the Dream of Red Mansions", which was published, with eight sentences: "The spit pot collapses and peels off the heart, and the moon is full of maple and maple." The red powder is really vivid, and the Jin in the bottle is boundless. The heart of the Xixuan drum board is still strong, and the Beipu pipa rhyme is not deserted. Bai Fu Shiling should be very happy, and set a pomp and circumstance for the barbarian ghosts. Subsequently, Wu Shichang and Xu Gongshi wrote the article "The Newly Discovered Poems of Cao Xueqin", which was published in the supplement of the "Cultural and Educational Data Bulletin" edited by the College of Nanjing Normal University in September 1974, and the first issue of the Journal of Harbin Normal University in 1975 was **, and the so-called "Cao Xueqin's Poems" were circulated nationwide. In April 1976, the revised edition of Zhou Ruchang's "A Dream of Red Mansions" was published, which recorded this poem and added the following words: "If there is something to be supplemented, go to the real distance, and the appendix is here, talk about imagination." Then, in the fourth issue of the Journal of Nanjing Normal University in 1977, an article entitled "Cao Xueqin's Poetry Distinguishes Forgeries", in which the author Chen Fang explicitly denied the authenticity of the poems. Wu Shichang rewrote the article "The ** and Authenticity of Cao Xueqin's Poems", which was published in the fourth issue of the Journal of Xuzhou Normal University in 1978, confirming that the poems were "not false", and refuted the statement that the "proposed supplement" was Zhou Ruchang. After several debates, in 1979, Zhou Ruchang finally stood up and said that the first six lines of the poem were "tried to make up", and a total of three poems were made up, when he just returned to the capital from Hubei Cadre School in the autumn of 1970. After a long period of litigation, the "Cao Xueqin's Poetry" case, which was shocked by the red academic circles, was finally concluded, and everyone breathed a sigh of relief.
In addition, there are Cao Xueqin's fan bones, bookcases, wardrobes, posthumous manuscripts, etc., which have been born one after another and are prosperous.
Feng Qiyong: A major discovery of Cao Xueqin's handwriting and relics in the past 1 or 200 years.
Recently, Cao Xueqin's remains and handwriting have been discovered in Beijing, as well as a mourning poem written by his "stepwife" after his death.
This is the first major discovery in two hundred years about the relics of this world-famous great writer. Its discovery broke two centuries of silence, and people finally saw the relics of this giant during his lifetime. The hand is still there, the ink marks are still there, seeing its relics, wanting to see it as a person, people's hearts can not be calm for a long time.