Since October, international criticism of the Israeli conflict has continued to escalate. Israel has not only come under fire from Gaza, but has also faced pressure from countries around the world and the United Nations to stop the conflict immediately. Although some of the Western countries have always been supportive of Israel, they have now joined the call for an immediate halt to Israeli forces. However, the Israeli prime minister's response to this was unusually tough, directly rejecting the call for a ceasefire. He said that these demands are inconsistent with Israel's war goals and therefore will never be accepted by the Israeli army. This position was reaffirmed at a recent intra-Israel meeting. The Israeli prime minister said that although they understand what is happening in Gaza, Israel's war goals have not been achieved, and its security interests have not been fully guaranteed, so they will never give up military action. The Israeli prime minister even made a speech in which he mocked France, Germany and other Western countries, accusing them of not being able to do both, supporting Israel and demanding that Israel stop. The Israeli Prime Minister stressed that such an attitude would only hinder the Israeli army from achieving its war goals, and hoped that these countries would carefully consider this. Israel** has clearly shown that it will not give up on its war goals even in the face of global pressure.
However, such a tough attitude is not without reason. Israel has always considered "Hamas" fighters to be a serious threat to ***. They continue to fire rockets at Israel, threatening the lives of Israeli civilians. In order to eliminate these threats, Israel considers military action necessary. In addition, Israel's political ecology is relatively complex, with right-wing parties playing an important role in politics. These right-wing parties have generally taken a hard line against the Palestinians and supported military action in the Gaza Strip. As a result, Israel** is facing pressure from right-wing forces in the country on the issue of its policy toward Gaza, and it is difficult to make a compromise.
Although Israel's military operations in the Gaza Strip have been condemned by the international community, it still has some significant international supporters, notably the United States. The United States has long been Israel's closest ally, providing military, economic, and diplomatic support. This has emboldened Israel in the face of pressure from the international community. Many American politicians, especially members of Congress, have taken a hardline stance against Israel. This support has given Israel more confidence in the face of external pressure. At previous UN meetings, the United States has repeatedly used the "one-vote veto" to block the passage of resolutions against Israel, which has greatly reduced the pressure on Israel.
In addition to political support, the United States is actively pushing for substantial military assistance to Israel. The United States has repeatedly made demands to Congress to immediately make demands to Israel. ** Says Congress should abandon the review process because U.S. "allies" face threats. Israel has a huge military advantage, especially in terms of air force and intelligence capabilities. This is one of the reasons why Israel dares to confront the international community and persist in war. In addition, Israel has built advanced air defense systems, such as the Iron Dome system, to protect civilians from rocket attacks.
However, even with this international support, Israel faces a series of troubles. Some countries have shouted slogans to sever diplomatic relations with Israel, and some armed groups have launched attacks against Israel. The intensifying international pressure has caused great distress to Israel.
In response to Israel's rejection of the international community's call for a ceasefire, as well as its domestic intransigence, we cannot ignore the complexity of international politics and the security threats facing Israel. Israel's decision-making is often influenced by a combination of factors, both domestic and foreign. Criticism from the international community is rising, but Israel has stood firm and demonstrated the importance they attach to the security of their country. They believe that lasting peace can only be achieved if the objectives of the war are achieved and security threats eliminated. While Israel faces international pressure, it is backed up by U.S. support.
However, we cannot detach ourselves from the framework of dialogue and peace negotiations for a fundamental solution to the conflict between the two sides. Only through consultation on an equal footing and the search for a viable solution can the long-standing conflict truly end. The international community should also participate more actively in and promote Palestinian-Israeli peace talks, intensify its good offices between the two sides, and create conditions for lasting peace.
In conclusion, I believe that the peaceful settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a complex process that requires the joint efforts of all parties. It is hoped that the international community will remain rational and calm, treat the legitimate concerns of both sides in a balanced manner, promote the negotiation process, and make joint efforts to achieve the goal of peaceful coexistence between Palestine and Israel.