The United States has recently fallen into the prelude to a real **, with Texas passing the strictest anti-abortion bill ever. The move caused huge waves in American society, and **quickly said that it would sue Texas**. Women took to the streets, and the march was huge. Several states have expressed their support and even refused to import Texas goods. Musk's ambiguous attitude in political positions was fiercely criticized by netizens, setting off a moral storm.
The Texas "Heartbeat Act" has sparked a social rift.
The controversial Anti-Abortion Act prohibits women from having an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, even if they are subject to **. This so-called "heartbeat bill" argues that a fetus with a heartbeat after six weeks is life, so abortion is tantamount to "homicide." The key to the outrage is that the bill not only criminalizes women who have abortions, but also criminalizes doctors who assist in abortions,** and taxi drivers who provide transportation to pregnant women, and faces hefty fines. As a result, few doctors in Texas dare to perform abortions on pregnant women, and the situation is worrying.
Circumventing Constitutional Challenges: Texas Takes a "People's Lawsuit" Approach.
In order to circumvent the U.S. Constitution, Texas chose the "people's lawsuit" approach, further exacerbating the controversy. The United States is a law of the sea system that uses case law, and Texas passed this bill in an attempt to shake the foundation of the rule of law in the United States. Here, it is worth noting that the U.S. Supreme Court had already affirmed in the early 70s that American women have the right to abortion, at least partially free to abortion until 24 weeks of pregnancy. But Texas' choice to adopt the "people's lawsuit" model makes the bill even more extreme.
The foundation of the rule of law is shaken: Texas' imitation of the Nazi approach is thought-provoking.
In order to oppose abortion, Texas followed the Nazi method and directly asked ordinary Texans to sue abortionists in their personal names. This is in stark contrast to the U.S. Constitution's provision that states** have judicial immunity. The Texas bill does not involve law enforcement, but encourages ordinary people to take the initiative to go to court to prosecute abortionists. This means that it is difficult for proponents of abortion rights to find unconstitutional targets, judges face very difficult decisions, and even whistleblowers can receive a reward of $10,000, which shakes the cornerstone of the rule of law in the United States.
Religious Extremism Dominant Values: The US Taliban's Crazy Opposition to Women's Abortion.
Why are right-wing and conservative parties in the United States so strongly antipathetic to women's abortion?This has to do with the profound religious extremist dominance of American history. The founders of the United States were Puritans, who, 500 years ago, were similar to today's Taliban with extreme views on religion, believing that all aspects of social life should be guided by religion. This kind of religious extremist dominance is deeply rooted, so that the American right wing has always had strong feelings for conservative religious beliefs.
* Prelude: The Texas Act sparked a divide in values within the United States.
Overall, Texas' Anti-Abortion Act is not only legally extreme, but also extraordinary in the way it is enforced. The adoption of the "people's lawsuit" method to encourage individuals to report has aroused great disgust in society. This controversy is not only about the struggle for abortion rights, but also about the deep differences in values within American society. Now, the Texas bill may only be the first step in the United States, and the huge differences in values within the United States will not be reconciled, and may become the fuse for future social tears.
The recent passage of the Anti-Abortion Act in Texas has sparked widespread social concern and controversy. The passage of this bill is not only of an extreme nature at the legal level, but also presents a different measure from the conventional way of implementation, which has triggered a deep reflection on American society.
First, the bill prohibits women from having an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, even in ** cases. These draconian restrictions have raised concerns about women's rights as a violation of women's autonomy. For the victims, the implementation of the bill is even more ruthless, making abortion an illegal act, which undoubtedly deepens the suffering of the victims.
Second, Texas has opted for a "people's lawsuit" approach, which is contrary to the traditional idea of the rule of law by incentivizing individuals to report the law. This leaves ordinary Texans suing abortionists on their own behalf, and judges facing a difficult situation to decide. In addition, the bill clearly stipulates that whistleblowers will receive a reward of $10,000, which undoubtedly challenges the bottom line of the rule of law and makes social justice confusing.
Even more worrying is the fact that the law is implemented in a way that mimics the Nazi era, reminiscent of the shadows of history. By allowing people to report others, Texas has raised concerns about personal privacy. This approach not only shakes the cornerstone of the rule of law in the United States, but also raises questions about social trust, which greatly challenges the public's confidence in judicial fairness.
In addition, the dominant values of religious extremism behind the Texas Act have also become a source of social division. The history of the United States is deep, the founders were Puritans, and their extreme views on religion have influenced the DNA of American society. As a result, right-wing conservatives maintain strong feelings about religious beliefs and show fierce opposition to issues such as women's abortion.
Overall, Texas' Anti-Abortion Act is not only controversial at the legal level, but also deeply divided over how it is implemented and values. The controversy highlights the diversity of values and concerns about individual rights within American society. The passage of the bill may only be the tip of the iceberg in American society, and a wider range of social dialogue and understanding is particularly urgent. While maintaining social justice, it is more necessary to seek a solution that can balance the interests of all parties in order to promote social harmony and progress.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!