Recently, the situation on the Korean Peninsula has been volatile, and the Hwasong-18 ICBM threat has intensified. The U.S. military sent Ohio-class nuclear submarines to South Korea, and tensions were heating up. This article will provide an in-depth look at these matters.
The most powerful nuclear submarine of the United States was unveiled in South Korea, shocking the world.
It is reported that the US military has decided to send Ohio-class nuclear submarines with a displacement of between 16,000 and 18,000 tons to visit South Korea. The submarine is equipped with more than 20 Trident submarine-launched intercontinental missiles with a range of more than 10,000 kilometers, and one missile can carry 6 to 14 nuclear warheads with a power of more than 9 million tons of TNT. In addition to the Ohio-class, the Columbia-class nuclear submarines being developed by the United States are more capable of fighting against the sky and can carry more than dozens of Trident submarine-launched nuclear missiles, constituting an absolute global nuclear deterrent.
Why did the United States send Ohio-class nuclear submarines to South Korea?
The U.S. move sends a dangerous signal and marks the first step in exerting maximum pressure on the peninsula. In recent years, the DPRK military has developed rapidly in strength, possessing a variety of intercontinental missiles with advanced performance, and gradually catching up with and surpassing the United States. In particular, the latest Hwasong-18 intercontinental missile, with a range of 15,000 kilometers and 10 nuclear warheads, demonstrates a powerful nuclear strike capability. In order to defend its security, North Korea even put forward the condition of giving priority to the use of nuclear weapons, warning the United States not to infringe.
With the rise of nuclear power in the DPRK, why did the United States take tough measures?
The DPRK's intercontinental missile technology has tilted the balance of military power on the entire peninsula in favor of the DPRK, causing concern in the United States. During the Trump era, the United States adopted a pragmatic attitude and established a "new type of DPRK-U.S. relationship" with the DPRK. However, after Biden took office, his policy toward North Korea changed dramatically, and he launched tough pressure to drive the strongest nuclear submarine directly to North Korea's door, which made people question his reason.
Why did Biden risk going to war with North Korea?
Biden may not be aware of the consequences of starting a war against North Korea. The total defeat of the US military in Afghanistan is a stark example of the fact that the DPRK military has nuclear weapons and cannot be taken lightly. If the United States attacks, the Russian army will inevitably intervene, and the situation will become more dangerous. Biden should think calmly and avoid triggering a war on the peninsula, but instead engage in dialogue with the North Korean side, follow Trump's pragmatic attitude, and establish a "new type of DPRK-US relationship" to ease the situation on the peninsula.
Epilogue. 
The Korean Peninsula game behind the North Korean nuclear crisis involves not only North Korea and the United States, but also several major powers. It is wise to be cautious about the North Korean nuclear issue and maintain peace on the peninsula. Biden should be vigilant, calmly respond to the situation, avoid unnecessary conflicts, and promote the establishment of a "new type of DPRK-US relationship" to bring stability to the peninsula.
The North Korean nuclear crisis and the visit of the most powerful US nuclear submarine to South Korea have aroused widespread concern in the international community, which is not only a manifestation of geopolitics, but also an important part of the global security landscape. First, the article details the background of the United States sending Ohio-class nuclear submarines to South Korea, emphasizing its strong capabilities in nuclear deterrence. This move is not only a response to North Korea's launch of the Hwasong-18 intercontinental missile, but also a concrete embodiment of the maximum pressure exerted by the United States on the Korean Peninsula issue.
From North Korea's perspective, the rapid development of its intercontinental missile technology plays a crucial role in the regional security landscape. The range and nuclear strike capability of the Hwasong-18 intercontinental missile give it a greater say in the affairs of the peninsula, and it also makes the United States feel considerable pressure. In order to safeguard its own security, the DPRK does not hesitate to adopt the condition of giving priority to the use of nuclear weapons, and this attitude has aroused strong repercussions in the international community. The article pointed out that behind the tough measures taken by the United States is the concern about the strength of the DPRK military, but it also emphasizes the necessity for the United States to respond calmly.
The author criticizes Biden's policy shift and questions his decision-making on the North Korean nuclear issue. Biden's approach to pressure on North Korea seems irrational and has even raised questions about whether a war will be waged. The article emphasized that Biden should recognize the current international situation, especially in view of the failure of the US military in Afghanistan, be cautious about the North Korean nuclear issue, and avoid unnecessary conflicts.
Overall, the article provides an in-depth analysis of the current state of the North Korean nuclear crisis and highlights the complexity of the regional security situation. At the same time, he raised questions about the change in US policy on the Korean Peninsula issue, believing that pragmatic dialogue is an effective way to ease tensions and maintain regional peace. This stance has a certain degree of objectivity and rationality, but it also needs to take into account that the United States may face complex pressures from many sides, including North Korea, to form a more comprehensive understanding. The responsibility for maintaining peace and stability on the peninsula lies not only with the DPRK but also with the joint efforts of all parties in the international community.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!