At the critical moment when the Russian-Ukrainian conflict continues to stalemate, an astonishing piece of news has suddenly been widely hyped on Ukraine
The Ukrainian authorities claim that their team recently penetrated deep into the Russian Far East and successfully carried out an attack inside a strategically important tunnel of the Baikal-Amur railway, claiming to have caused serious damage to key Russian railway communication lines.
Specifically, Ukraine claims that they had placed a large number of ** devices in the "Severomuysky Tunnel" and detonated them, causing serious damage to a Russian freight train loaded with large amounts of aviation fuel. The more than 15-kilometre Severomuyrsky Tunnel is a strategic link between Siberia and the Baikal-Amur Railway in the Russian Far East.
For a time, this ** incident, which was enough to create a strong social psychological impact, immediately caused a sensation inside and outside Ukraine.
But what is even more inexplicable is that as soon as the news came out, the relevant departments in Ukraine immediately hinted that the incident had some connection with China, and said that it was some kind of "warning" to China.
It is obvious that this rather far-fetched association of the Ukrainian side is actually hoping to deliberately exaggerate to give the international community the illusion that China is providing Russia with a large number of ** equipment. This just proves that there is a very high probability that some special political purpose of the Ukrainian side is hidden behind this incident.
At the same time, Russian officials have remained silent about this. Russian media only briefly reported on a fire on a freight train in Siberia, and did not mention any news of the occurrence of **. This undoubtedly adds to the mystery of the truth of the incident.
Why did Ukraine choose to create political hype about this ** incident at such a time?We have to have deep doubts.
First, this incident seems to be an attempt to create international pressure on China. At a time when the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has entered a state of stalemate, it is obviously a political idea for European and American countries to take some kind of action against China to force a ceasefire between the two sides to achieve a diplomatic breakthrough. And exaggerating China's large amount of supply to Russia creates a foundation for exerting pressure on China in the future.
Second, it could also be a political maneuver by Ukraine to get more Western aid. By exaggerating the greater existential crisis it is facing, Ukraine hopes to further stimulate the rescue awareness of Western countries and increase military material support for Ukraine. Behind this is the current embarrassing situation of Ukraine's extreme dependence on Western imports.
However, it is clear that the contrast in the attitudes of all parties in this incident also indicates to a certain extent the possible complications of the follow-up. We have reason to suspect that the truth of this incident may be more complicated, and that all parties are looking for some kind of political benefit in this incident.
Therefore, although Ukraine claims that this ** incident is of great strategic importance, it is necessary for the outside world to be sufficiently skeptical about it. At the same time, we also hope that all parties concerned will remain rational and restrained, and refrain from exaggerating and exploiting such incidents to escalate regional tensions.
China has repeatedly reiterated that it has always advocated the settlement of international disputes through dialogue and consultation, which will also be the only reasonable way to alleviate the Ukraine crisis and achieve lasting peace in Europe. We hope that the international community will continue to understand and support China's efforts and position.
Look for an AI Writer Program