The long-standing antagonism between the United States and Russia stems from the struggle for hegemony. Although there is no deep hatred in history, the hegemonic mentality has always dominated the actions of both sides. This contention has led to a needle-to-point confrontation between the United States and Russia. The United States does not tolerate the existence of any country that could threaten its hegemony and therefore always resorts to various means to limit its development or weaken its power.
For example, the Russia-Ukraine conflict is a consumption of Russia's strength by the United States through Ukraine as a leading person. As the leader of the alliance, the United States called on many countries to impose encirclement and suppressive sanctions on Russia, and at the same time provided Ukraine with a large number of military supplies, equipment and financial support, which led to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict turning into a war of attrition. In essence, Russia's adversary is a force formed by the United States, NATO, and many Western countries. As the situation continues to develop, there are fears that if Russia cannot hold on, and the United States and NATO exert excessive pressure, it may trigger a war between the United States and Russia.
If there is a real head-on conflict between the United States and Russia, who will stand up for Russia?Russian Putin once said: "There are always these three." This is not a country, but the three armies of Russia. Needless to say, at all times, only one's own army will loyally stand on the front lines of the country and fight for the country.
Many events have shown that self-help comes first, and the most reliable is always oneself. State-to-state relations are often about interests and rarely pure. Once interests change, former allies may turn into antagonism. Therefore, other countries should not be expected to be on the same side. Despite Russia's economic disadvantage, the United States has long been afraid of its vast nuclear arsenal, which it has inherited since the Soviet era. Therefore, the United States' targeting of Russia is in line with its original intentions.
Putin's remarks show that there are no eternal allies in the world, and that flying separately in adversity is the norm. The hard-line Putin has even publicly stated that if Russia disappears, there is no point in the world's existence. This is also an attitude of Putin towards nuclear war. If Russia is in a desperate situation, a nuclear war may break out, this is Russia's bottom line. Putin's remarks remind us that one's own strength is the key to future wars, and that even hardcore allies are not reliable.
U.S.-Russia relations have always been a hot topic of concern on the international stage. The article delves into the complex relationship between the United States and Russia and the political wrestling behind it, albeit in limited space, but it covers the power struggle, the exchange of interests, and Putin's firm stance on Russia.
First of all, the article highlights the fundamental cause of US-Russian relations - the struggle for hegemony. This struggle for regional and international power has led to hostility and-for-tat confrontation between the two sides. As a world power, the United States has always allowed no country to threaten its hegemony, and Russia is one of the only countries capable of confronting it. This kind of geopolitical contest is not only limited to conflicts in a single field, but also involves the global pattern and the distribution of interests.
Second, the article mentions the Russia-Ukraine conflict, highlighting the use of Ukraine by the United States to limit and weaken Russia's power. This is not only a conflict between the two sides at the geopolitical level, but also an exchange and transfer of interests between countries. In this case, the article points out that even if there is an alliance, if the interests change, the ally may turn into an adversary. This realistic viewpoint has a certain enlightening significance for the understanding of international politics.
In addition, Putin's statement is mentioned in the article. Putin emphasized his own strength, the loyalty of his military, and his bottom-line stance on nuclear war. This shows Russia's determination to firmly defend its national interests in the face of external pressure. This firm and hard-line attitude also reflects the importance that powerful countries attach to their own security and interests in international politics.
In general, although the article does not deal too much with the historical origins and development of US-Russian relations, its analysis of US-Russian relations at the present stage is relatively objective and in-depth. It presents readers with a complex and ever-changing international political situation, reminding us that when understanding international relations, we need to take into account multiple factors such as interests, strength, and historical background, rather than simply looking at them from the perspective of allies and enemies.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!