Introduction: The Fukushima nuclear accident has had a profound impact on Japanese society, especially for the residents of Fukushima, who have lost their homes and are facing great hardship. They have filed a class action lawsuit in the hope of getting the compensation and recognition they deserve. However, the judgment of the Tokyo High Court on the 26th was very disappointing, confirming the responsibility of TEPCO and denying the state responsibility of Japan** for the Fukushima nuclear accident. Such a ruling has sparked dissatisfaction and ** among many victims and the population.
The judgment of the Tokyo High Court on the 26th denied Japan's national responsibility for the Fukushima nuclear accident, only determined the responsibility of TEPCO, and demanded compensation from TEPCO. This result is very disappointing, especially for the victims and voiceless residents who would have expected a just verdict and a fair compensation package. However, the reality is that their expectations have been shattered once again, and their voices have not been adequately heeded and respected.
In the judgment, the Court held that the tsunami was larger than expected and became the main basis for denying State responsibility. However, the adequacy of this justification still needs to be considered in depth. As a country, especially a highly developed and technologically advanced country, Japan** should fully consider all possible disaster scenarios before a nuclear accident occurs, and take corresponding precautionary measures to protect its own people and the environment. Therefore, it would be unfair to place the blame entirely on the tsunami that was larger than expected.
After the verdict was announced, many people who supported the judicial protest of Fukushima residents gathered in front of the Tokyo High Court to express their disappointment and dissatisfaction. They shouted slogans demanding that Japan take responsibility for the nuclear accident. These voices not only represent the interests of the victims, but also the opposition and suspicion of the whole society against the unfair ruling. It is very disappointing and angry that the policies promoted by the state have led to the victimization of the people and have not been responsible.
In the voice of the public, some people pointed out that the court was too obedient to the opinion of the Supreme Court and lacked concerns about the position of the parties. This impression gives the impression that justice is not really fair to these victims and their claims.
The importance of this judgment lies not only in the class action lawsuit over the Fukushima nuclear accident, but also in the determination of state responsibility for the nuclear accident in the future. Last year's Supreme Court's unified decision denying State responsibility raises concerns about the outcome of similar lawsuits in the future. If the State does not shoulder its due responsibility, then the victims will not be able to receive just compensation and recognition, which is a serious harm to the victims and social justice.
Summary: The Fukushima nuclear accident class action decision has sparked widespread concern and controversy. Although TEPCO has been found responsible and demanded compensation, there is no clear answer as to whether there is state responsibility for the Fukushima nuclear accident. This not only affects the protection of the rights and interests of Fukushima residents, but also affects the concept of fairness and justice in Japanese society as a whole. As a highly developed country, Japan** should take responsibility for the Fukushima nuclear accident and take measures to protect its citizens and the environment. It is only under a just and fair verdict that the victims can be comforted psychologically and materially, and society can be restored to harmony and stability.