As the New Year's bell rings, the film market ushers in a new round of competition. In this New Year's Eve period full of expectations, the love movie of "Twinkle Twinkle Twinkle Star" has achieved remarkable results with its loyal fans - the box office exceeded the 200 million mark on the opening day, which is a rare grand occasion during the Spring Festival. 
However, this seemingly beautiful movie has caused huge controversy among the audience. Click on the comment area, and the screen is full of ——"Fraud", "A Lump of Defense", "Wonderful", "The Most Crotch-Pulling on New Year's Day", "AI Script". 
The public's dissatisfaction showed a striking consistency, so much so that the topic quickly made it to the hot search list, with the word "terrible" alone triggering a whopping 1300 million views. 
First, let's talk about the film's box office performance. There's no denying that the success of Twinkle Twinkle Twinkle Star is truly eye-catching. Without the blessing of top traffic stars and first-line celebrities, it can achieve such results in the fierce competition, which is enough to prove that it has a certain attractiveness. This may be due to its novel subject matter, unique storytelling, or the success of its promotional strategy. In any case, box office success is a positive fact. However, when we dig deeper into the film, we see the dilemma it faces. Many viewers questioned the plot and logic of "Twinkle Twinkle Twinkle Star". They believe that the advancement of the story lacks reasonable logic, the plot setting is too bizarre, and there are even absurd scenes such as the hero and heroine suddenly jumping to the moon. How many film and television dramas has been fed by a "The Wandering Earth", it is obvious that it will rub it!However, this kind of story setting that is detached from reality makes it difficult for the audience to resonate, which affects the viewing experience. There is also a plot between the male and female protagonists, in order to raise 9999 yuan to name a planet after the male protagonist, the heroine Lin Beixing had to face the dilemma of failing the college entrance examination, choosing to repeat and participate in cram schools, and at the same time looking for various part-time jobs. She almost gave up her studies and only thought about making money. However, despite the deadline for registration, she made very little money. At the same time, in order to protect the heroine, the male protagonist decides to engage in a life-and-death struggle with a group of thugs. However, the way he chooses to fight is - in the battle with these gangsters, the male protagonist seems to be "dead". 
After being beaten up by them, the gangsters were imprisoned, but the male protagonist, who was originally dying, miraculously recovered his vitality in an instant, as if he had only suffered some skin injuries. Anyway, it seems a little outrageous!In addition to the plot issues, the performance of the actors is also a focus of criticism from the audience. Although some viewers think that Zhang Jianing and Qu Chuxiao's acting skills are remarkable, in some emotional scenes, they still seem a little powerless, which makes the audience feel embarrassed. Maybe in the TV series, through soft filters and character settings, the 34-year-old Zhang Jianing can barely adapt to the role, so as not to make the audience feel too abrupt. 
However, when a close-up of her face appeared on the big screen, it was difficult for the audience to accept. After all, no matter how young she is, can an actor in her thirties really stay natural under the lens of a movie to play an eighteen-year-old character?There is also a snow resort that thousands of spectators have been looking forward to. However, when it does snow in the theater, it's really funny. Among the moviegoers in the theater, some people were drenched in soup by the sudden snowfall, not only could not enjoy the food, but even the well-groomed hair and makeup were ruined. In the theater, someone suddenly shouted: "Zhang Wansen, kill insects!."If you look closely, it turns out that in the process of "artificial snowfall", although the staff had the intention to create an atmosphere, due to their limited ability, the snow flakes turned into a shape similar to insects, which caused the audience to exclaim. 
To sum up, although "Twinkle Twinkle Twinkle Star" has achieved some success at the box office, there are many problems in the storyline, actors' performances, etc., resulting in a generally low evaluation by the audience. This phenomenon can't help but make us reflect on what should be the standard for the success of a movie?Is it the box office figures, or the audience's word-of-mouth?On this issue, we may need more thought and **. Of course, we should also see that "Twinkle Twinkle Twinkle Star" is not useless. So, did you go to watch "Twinkle Twinkle Twinkle Star" on New Year's Eve?
Twinkle twinkle twinkle star