In the article "9 High Dividend Dividends** Evaluation, Which One Are You Optimistic For?"."mentioned a product: Golden Eagle dividend value, analysis to the end, found that the product belongs to the style drift, the reason why it is "atypical" is because the product performance is relatively strong, which is quite different from the previous style drift of the Laji.
First, let's look at the contract first
Performance benchmarksIt is the yield of CSI Dividend Index * 60% + the yield of SSE Treasury Bond Index * 40%;
Investment Style:Value;
Investment Scope:**The focus of the investment is on high-quality products with good cash dividend ability and outstanding long-term investment value**;
Investment Objective::Through high-quality investment with good dividend ability and outstanding long-term investment value, this ** asset obtains stable current income and long-term value.
As can be seen from the above, this product should be a bonus product.
Second, the status quo
At the moment, though, the style has changed dramatically:
Judging from the top ten heavy stocks and the third quarter report, the product in the third quarter is mainly allocated to technology stocks, Chen Ying said in the third quarter report, looking back on the third quarter, the ** has maintained a high **, focusing on the allocation of electronics, computers, media as the representative of the high-tech sector, especially in mid to late August, we further improved, and concentrated the position structure. Mainly because we recognize the bottom position of the market, many technology stocks have strong investment value.
Judging from the changes in the industry allocation of the value of Golden Eagle Dividend in the past three years, this product is more of a growth style product, and it is more like a TMT product at this stage.
3. Views on the matter
In fact, we are more concerned about whether the performance is strong enough than whether the style drifts. That is to say, performance is king, and style is at your discretion. However, if the performance is poor, you have to talk about the style drift contract stipulation, and if you violate the contract, you can even get compensation.
For ** companies, it is best to understand the ability circle of their own ** managers before matching the corresponding products, and don't bury mines for yourself. For our people, don't look at the name to buy products, the most fundamental thing is to start from the perspective of the manager's circle of competence.
Finally, do you mind style drift?
This article is a personal opinion, the views are time-sensitive, not as investment advice, past performance does not represent future performance, the market is risky, investment needs to be cautious.