Regaining Freedom Qian Xuesen and the Notice of Permission to Leave .

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-29

On August 5, 1955, Qian Xuesen, who had been under house arrest for five years, finally learned of his permission to leave the country, and the difficult experience revealed the absurdity of McCarthyism.

On August 5, 1955, Qian Xuesen went to the Los Angeles Immigration and Naturalization Bureau to report his whereabouts as usual. A thin document was in his hands, and his heart was beating faster - it was the "Notice of Permission to Leave the Country" that he had been waiting for for a long time, but had long lost hope.

Planting and betrayal: Qian Xuesen's honey trap.

In June 1950, strangers broke into Qian Xuesen's Caltech office, claiming that there was evidence that he was a member of the Red Professors group in the United States. McCarthyism swept the United States, and a wave of suspicion of employee loyalty swept the United States. Qian Xuesen was branded "disloyal" for refusing to betray his friends.

Kimbell's Betrayal and Obstruction: The Blade Behind a Close Friend.

In order to prevent Qian Xuesen from returning to China, his close friend Jin Bell was worried that he would not come back. As a result, Qian Xuesen was placed under house arrest and his research path was cut off. Kimbell originally planned to solve the problem with gentle means, but he did not expect that the simple and rude behavior of the Americans would lead to a series of behaviors that hurt Qian Xuesen's dignity.

The way out: the unyielding efforts of Qian Xuesen and his family.

During his house arrest, Qian Xuesen was forced to engage in engineering control research and wrote more than 300,000 words of "Engineering Cybernetics". Despite adversity, he and his family never gave up their efforts to return home.

Desperate Help: Qian Xuesen's letter and an ingenious scheme.

In May 1955, Qian Xuesen's wife, Jiang Ying, skillfully sent a letter asking for help. By clever design, they managed to evade surveillance and send letters to Belgium. The letter finally arrived in China and attracted the attention of China.

Diplomatic mediation: A bizarre scene of U.S.-China wrestling.

After the intervention of Eisenhower in the United States, he assessed that Qian Xuesen's knowledge of rockets was outdated and decided to let him go. China and the United States wrestled fiercely in the ambassadorial-level talks in Geneva, and in the end, the departure permit was issued to Qian Xuesen.

Victory and Return: Qian Xuesen's Road to Freedom.

On the day he was granted permission to leave Hong Kong, Qian Xuesen resigned from all his duties and booked a ticket back to Hong Kong. Despite repeated obstructions by the US authorities, he was finally on the path of freedom back home.

On August 5, 1955, Qian Xuesen held the notice of permission to leave the country, regained his freedom, and ended the long years of house arrest. His story teaches us that an indomitable will and a belief in what is right can ultimately triumph over absurdity and injustice.

Total word count of the article: 656 words).

Regaining Freedom: The Story of Qian Xuesen and the "Notice of Permission to Leave" is deeply touching, showing the perseverance and perseverance of a scientist in the face of political turmoil. This essay vividly depicts the hardships that Qian Xuesen endured during his time in McCarthyism, and how he eventually regained his freedom.

First of all, Qian Xuesen's experience reflects the social and political turmoil in the United States at that time. In the shadow of McCarthyism, a wave of suspicious employees swept the United States, and many scientists were blacklisted for their withdrawn personalities, independent and uninhibited. This political trend had a huge impact on intellectuals, not only restricting their academic research, but also giving them absurd accusations, such as Qian Xuesen being branded as "disloyal".

Secondly, the betrayal and obstruction of his close friend Kimbell made Qian Xuesen's predicament even deeper. This exposes the dark side of intrigue and betrayal in the society of the time. Qian Xuesen became the object of suspicion because he refused to betray his friends, and this kind of simple and crude review logic that disregarded the truth was deeply distressing.

In the predicament, the perseverance of Qian Xuesen and his family is even more admirable. Despite being under house arrest, Qian Xuesen did not stop researching, and instead engaged in engineering control research, writing "Engineering Cybernetics". This optimism and positivity demonstrates a scientist's determination to maintain professionalism in the face of adversity. And his wife Jiang Ying's ingenious strategy added a lot to the story, and through her wisdom, she successfully sent a letter of help to China, which attracted the attention of **.

In the context of the Sino-American wrestling, Eisenhower's intervention finally allowed Qian Xuesen to obtain permission to leave the country. This process illustrates the complexity of diplomatic mediation and international relations. Although the Geneva talks between China and the United States did not achieve substantive results at first, Qian Xuesen's case became one of the key points in the talks, demonstrating a certain degree of humanitarian concern in international diplomacy.

In the end, Qian Xuesen was finally freed, and the scene of returning to China was exciting. He remained resilient in the face of adversity and eventually overcame all odds. This story tells us that justice will eventually triumph over injustice, and that the mission of scientists is not only to contribute to scientific exploration, but also to contribute to social justice.

Overall, "Regaining Freedom: Qian Xuesen and the "Notice of Permission to Leave" is not only a story, but also a testimony to history and a celebration of the spirit of scientists. This story inspires people to think about justice, perseverance, and freedom, and sets us up as a model for science to look up to.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages