Some people call it the rescue operation of **, and some people question whether Evergrande Group should be treated so leniently. Whether this move is a trade-off between the cost of housing completion and the cost of social stability, let's dig into the question.
First, let's take a look at the role of Evergrande Group. The real estate giant has long been synonymous with greed and ambition. They have not only expanded in the real estate sector, but also extended their business tentacles to various fields such as football, movies, and the health industry. Their high leverage, extravagance, and high levels of debt are among the reasons they are in the predicament they are in. This is not only a problem of a company, but also the risk of the entire industry, if the ** is too tolerant, so that Evergrande Group can not do it, then similar incidents will continue to occur in the future, and the people will continue to be harmed.
For Evergrande Group, the intervention of ** is undoubtedly a straw that pulls them out of the quagmire. The mess left by the founder Xu Jiayin is finally willing to be taken over, which can be said to be good news for Evergrande. **'s shot made their sins seem less serious, at least financially, and they could breathe a sigh of relief. However, does that mean they are exempt from their due responsibility?I'm afraid not.
After all, for those people who have bought Evergrande off-plan, the down payment is not just a matter of money, it represents their life savings. Paying a down payment but not getting a house is equivalent to a lifetime of savings being wasted, plus the futureThe burden of housing loans for 30 years is really unjustified for the people. The problem is not just a financial loss, but also an impact on life and disillusionment with hope.
The intervention of ** has brought hope to these people, and also made them re-see the responsibility and responsibility of the people. ** is undoubtedly sending a clear signal to the people: we care about you, and we are willing to help you solve problems. This is exactly what the Chinese people are looking forward to, and it is commendable.
However, does the intervention of ** mean that Evergrande can escape all responsibility?Evergrande Group should bear their responsibility in this turmoil, whether it is compensation for home buyers or responsibilities to investors, there is no escaping. ** is a temporary emergency measure and cannot replace the legal responsibility of the enterprise.
In addition to ** and enterprises, we also need to fundamentally rethink the problems of the real estate market。China's real estate market is overbooming and highly leveraged, and the Evergrande incident is just a tipping point. ** The supervision of the real estate industry should be strengthened to prevent similar risks from happening again and protect the interests of the people. This is a matter of safeguarding the rights and interests of all ordinary people, not just a few rich people.
Finally, the people should also raise their awareness of risks, do not be carried away by the excessively high property market prosperity, consume rationally, buy houses prudently, and do not blindly follow the trend of investment. Only with the joint efforts of the people, enterprises and enterprises can we jointly guard a healthy and stable real estate market and protect the legitimate rights and interests of everyone.
** has brought hope to the people, but it should not be an excuse for enterprises to evade responsibility. Evergrande Group should assume their responsibilities, strengthen the supervision of the real estate industry, and the people should also improve their risk awareness. Only by working together can we safeguard a healthy and stable real estate market and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the people. I hope that this incident can serve as a lesson, so that we can be more vigilant, more cautious in the face of risks in the real estate market, and ensure that the vital interests of all people are not infringed upon.