Recently, a certain Kun lawyer firm issued a statement, accusing criminals of impersonating their names to open a WeChat *** called "A certain Kun Law" to confuse the public, and condemned the WeChat *** for publishing an article suspected of instigating others to falsify evidence, which had a very bad impact on the reputation of a certain Kun law firm.
A Kun law firm issued a solemn statement to it:
Judging from the apology letter of a certain Kun legal consulting company, it probably refers to an article "How to Legally Expel a Pregnant Woman" in the publication of ***. A Kun legal consulting firm claimed that the article was purely fictitious and had been deleted, and apologized for the misunderstanding caused to the law firm and readers.
Surprisingly, the apology letter of a certain Kun legal consulting company did not choose to keep a low profile, but responded positively to a certain Kun Law Firm
"The level of a certain Kun law firm is just like this, no wonder Chinese lawyers are generally not respected, so it is not the company that smears the lawyer's practice group, but your own Kun law firm. [Quoted from the original text of the apology letter].They accused a certain Kun law firm of not being adequate, saying that the content it published was full of bizarre theories and views that lacked legal literacy.
In addition, a certain Kun legal consulting company mentioned the following in the article, questioning the statement of a certain Kun lawyer that the evidence in the article had been notarized and fixed.
"The company published an article after the notary office got off work and in the middle of the night, a certain Kun law firm said that the evidence had been fixed in the early morning, could it be that a certain Kun law firm went through the formalities overnight to go to the notary office, and the notary office worked overtime until late at night to conduct Internet notarization for a certain Kun law firm, or a certain Kun law firm took a screenshot of its own to be regarded as fixed evidence. [Quoted from the original text of the apology letter].I want to say that in recent years, with the development of notary technology and the implementation of the concept of notarization for the convenience of the people, the use of the remote notary system developed by the notary public for real-time evidence collection and "non-contact" remote application for office certificates has long become a common way to fix evidence, and it does not require the parties to run to the notary office overnight, let alone the notary office to work overtime until late at night. JustAs far as the notary cloud electronic data platform is concerned, its functions such as "web forensics", "witness record", "mobile phone screen recording" and other functions can be 7x24 hours to fix real-time evidence on any online content and self-proof in the notary office serverIf there is a need in the future, you can apply for a certificate to the notary office on the system at any time and issue a notarial certificate of certificate protection.
At present, "a certain Kun law" has officially sued "a certain kun law firm", and everyone will wait and see what the final result will be. Remind that in litigation disputes, the importance of evidence cannot be ignored, and notarized evidence is the best weapon to protect your own rights and interests.