Johnson as the formerPrime Minister of the United Kingdom, which has recently become a hot topic again, however, not because of his excellent performance, but because he was accused of sabotaging the Russian-Ukrainian negotiations in Turkey last year. Some Western experts believe that this is a joint means by the United States and Ukraine to shake the blame and try to shift the blame for sabotaging the peace talks to Johnson, who has already stepped down. Judging by Johnson's performance since leaving office, he seems to have made a suitable scapegoat. Although he considered returning to the mountain after Truss's resignation, he eventually chose to quitPoliticsstage, complete Sunak. However, this was not due to Johnson's generosity, but because he realized that it would be almost impossible to return to the prime minister in a short period of time, so he simply chose to quit so as not to become a laughing stock. From there, Johnson continued to serve as a member of parliament until he resigned from his position shortly afterwards and joined a ** job. So let such a stay awayPoliticsThe people on stage seem to have no problem taking the blame.
However, at the moment, the former prime minister, who is far away from the United Kingdom, seems to have a chance to returnPoliticsstage, regain everything you have lost.
According to Russia's RT, Sunak facedSecretary of State for the InteriorBraverman andImmigrationThe resignation of Minister Janrik has further tested his authority in the Conservative Party. In particular, Sunak will face RwandaImmigrationDealing with the key vote on the plan, which is at the heart of Sunak's policy. If the plan fails, then Sunak's prestige will hit rock bottom. Within the Conservative Party, some supporters of Sunak are campaigning to persuade them to support Sunak's plans, and some have even promised knighthoods. Opponents of Sunak want to remove him outright. Clearly, Sunak is in a difficult situation and cannot even reach a consensus within the Conservative Party, so how can he pursue his own policies?
According to a report by the UK, the Conservative Party generally believes that Johnson, who resigned as prime minister, is the only one who has the skills to challenge Labour leader Starmer. With it having to take place by January 2025, Labour's current lead has Conservative politicians very anxious. As a result, they show no mercy to the prime minister of their own party, and if there is no hope, they will be eager to change the leader and bring someone who can stand up to Labour to power. Compared with newcomers such as Truss and Sunak, Johnson is unreliable, but he has a prominent background and a wealth of experience. Therefore, for the Conservative Party, inviting Johnson back to fight internally is indeed a way to go, at least better than sitting back and waiting.
At the same time, in the United States, the former **TrumpWe are trying to get backThe White Houseand have made some progress. TrumpIt is a far lead in the Republican Party, and it is also 4 percentage points ahead in the support rating for Biden. Judging by the current situation,TrumpReturn toThe White HouseThe possibilities are very high. If Britain invites Johnson back again, it will mean Johnson andTrumpThe return of these two once embarrassed heads of state to their original positions will undoubtedly arouse interest and concern. As "democratic" countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom, they always take pride in their elections, and often use them as a gimmick. However, at present, it seems that the so-called election is just a farce, just a few people taking turns to play, even if they are ousted, after a few years, they can return on a high profilePoliticsStage. This is undoubtedly a mockery of the so-called "democratic" system.
Review the wholeBritish PoliticsThe situation, Johnson's re-rise andTrumpReturn toThe White HouseThe possibility raises questions about elections and democratic institutions. While we often praise elections as the heart of democracy, this rise and return raises questions. Is it true that the democratic system is just a flowery cloak, and in fact the real power is not in the hands of the people?Or is election just a formality, and real power is often held by a small privileged segment?
It reminds me of my own experience. As a self-editor, I am well aware of the power play behind journalism, which is often driven by profit. Such personnel changes and power struggles are only a façade, and there are deeper interests hidden behind themPoliticsGambling. However, we should not despair about this, and we should continue to pay attention to and think about how to further improve the democratic system so that democracy can move from form to substance and better serve the well-being of the people.