The results of the first winter test were questioned by many car companies because of their inaccuracy, and the second test was carried out yesterday, but the encounter of Lynk & Co 08 was indeed a bit miserable, and it just ran 6The test was terminated directly after 5 kilometers because of engine intervention, but this method of handling is a bit unfair.
In fact, to be honest, this winter test itself is a bit biased for Lynk & Co 08, because the battery of 08 is made of PTC material, which is intended to strengthen the protection of the vehicle battery under low temperature conditions through high thermal conductivity and high power materials. It is directly minus 40 degrees Celsius, which itself greatly increases the energy consumption of Lynk & Co 08 battery protection, and the advantages of the car have directly become disadvantages.
In addition, there is the problem of the car with the engine intervention, should the remaining power of the car itself be announced when the engine is involved, if it is because the power is not enough, the engine intervention is indeed no problem, but if the remaining battery power of the car is still sufficient? Does this mean that the pure electric range of the car is more than 6 degrees below 40 degrees?5 km, to be honest, this data is really hard to convince, the winter test is a good thing, but the test should be more rigorous.