Since ancient times, the European continent has repeatedly undergone vigorous uprisings, the most typical of which are the rise of France during Napoleon, the German Empire during World War I, and German fascism in World War II. These rising powers, without exception, quickly occupied the countries of Western Europe and then set their sights on Russia. This rule, although it ended in failure during the Napoleonic and Hitler eras, has not changed to this day. Why did the European powers go east to Russia after they rose?What kind of inevitability is hidden in this?
From a geopolitical point of view, the over-fragmentation of Europe has always been a problem. Today, Europe is divided into 48 countries, and it is likely to continue to do so in the future**, resulting in a long-term fragmentation of the entire region. Since ancient times, many powerful empires have had dreams of unifying Europe, including Napoleon and Germany. However, Western Europe is relatively easy to occupy in order to achieve this goal, and it is Eastern Europe that is most challenging.
Eastern Europe is not only rich in resources and fertile land, but also has a unique geographical location, which makes it a must-stop on the way to the Middle East. Historically, many rising nations have aspired to unify Europe and build a unified European empire. However, in order to unify Europe, it is necessary to occupy Eastern Europe, and to occupy Eastern Europe, it is necessary to defeat Russia, because in modern times Russia has always had deep control over Eastern Europe, especially militarily.
More than half of Europe is in Russian hands, occupying more than 10 million square kilometers of the country. For the rising France and Germany, the lack of resources and strategic space was the biggest problem, so the eastward crusade against Russia became an inevitable choice. They believed that by seizing Russia, the whole of Europe would be under control, unified, and even extend their territory and control to North Asia.
However, although the European part of Russia was mostly plain, easy to attack and difficult to defend, every crusade ended in failure. Both Napoleon and Hitler hit a wall in Russia, which ultimately led to their defeat. Even before the Middle Ages, the rising Roman Empire and others experienced a similar fate. Russia's deep roots in Eastern Europe make it difficult for any country that wants to unify Europe to get around it.
After the rise of European powers, the dream of an eastward crusade against Russia has never been realized. Russia's strong resistance has allowed Europe to continue**, and so far no forces have emerged capable of uniting the whole of Europe. This old dream seems to be becoming more and more distant, while Europe remains in a state of fragmentation.
While looking back at history, we cannot help but wonder whether the struggles and wars within Europe were really so fierce that they could not be unifiedIs the fragmentation of Europe doomed it to a truly unified whole?Perhaps, there are more mysteries worth pondering in the vicissitudes of history.
In this long history full of mysteries, the question of why European powers went east after their rise to Russia may be one of the puzzles that historians and thinkers will never be able to answer. Perhaps in the years to come, a new chapter in history will reveal more about the road to European unity.
This article profoundly examines the question of why European powers are going east to Russia after the rise of the European powers, and provides a detailed analysis from multiple perspectives such as history, geopolitics and strategy. First, the article begins by pointing out the seemingly united but fierce struggle within Europe, and illustrates the complex relationship between Western countries through the fact that the two world wars caused the greatest human harm. This kind of infighting has been manifested many times in European history, such as the rise of France during the Napoleonic period and the German fascism in the two world wars, both of which were manifested in the crusade against Russia after the rise of great powers.
The author highlights a central point that a united Europe is the key reason behind this phenomenon. Europe is fragmented due to geographical location and other factors, and the rise of great powers from ancient times to the present day has dreamed of unifying the continent. The article points out that in order to unify Europe, Eastern Europe is a difficult hurdle to bypass. Eastern Europe is rich in resources and fertile land, and it is a battleground for the rising countries of Europe. However, to occupy Eastern Europe, it is necessary to defeat Russia first, because Russia has long had deep control over Eastern Europe, especially in military terms.
The logic of the article is rigorous, and through the in-depth analysis of history, it clearly outlines the inevitability of the European power's eastward expedition against Russia. At the same time, through the analysis of Russia's geographical and resource advantages on the European continent, the reader is presented with the dilemma behind this crusade. Finally, the article reviews several crusades in history, highlighting the strong resistance of Russia, which led to the failure of Europe to achieve unification, which is still fragmented to this day.
It seems to me that this article comprehensively and deeply explains the phenomenon of the struggle within Europe and the crusade of great powers against Russia from several angles. In particular, the historical, geographical, and strategic aspects of the analysis allow the reader to better understand the root causes of this phenomenon. Although the article does not go into too much detail about specific historical events, it reveals the profound connotation of why European powers have to go east to Russia after the rise of the cocoon. Perhaps, such in-depth thinking can lead to more thinking about European history, so that readers can have a clearer understanding of this complex and tortuous historical process.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!