Rural arable land redistribution in 2024Three categories of people do not have access to land
The clearing of farmland in rural areas is coming to an end. The question is what to do with the many new arable land in rural areas. At present, there are not many farmers farming in rural areas, but it is estimated that no one wants to plant if they do not want to farm. Even if you don't want to plant your own farmland, you don't want to give it up in vain. Even when they see new arable land, they want more. The most difficult are the peasants who have lived in the countryside for decades without a single piece of land. In their view, they all hope that the arable land in the countryside can be redistributed.
i.The state of cultivated land in rural areas.
At present, the first distribution of cultivated land in the hands of peasant households to households on the basis of the rural population was in the 80s of the 20th century, and there is also data on the extension of the distribution for the first time. At the end of the 90s of the 20th century, a second round of extensions was carried out with slight changes. However, the second round of contract extensions largely retains the data from the first round. This means that the number of rural households has increased and decreased, but the area of arable land has not changed. Therefore, some families have more than a dozen acres of land, while some families have more than a dozen people but do not have a single piece of arable land. Such an uneven distribution of arable land has led many farmers to put forward their own opinions.
ii.So, will rural arable land be disrupted and redistributed in 2024?
In response to the recent rumors circulating online that by 2024, all rural arable land will be destroyed and then all village arable land will be divided equally according to the population of each household. Is this news true?Will the state redistribute land in this way?
In fact, in this year's No. 1 document, the state has given a clear answer. That is, rural cultivated land will not be disturbed or redistributed, but will continue to be the data object of the second round of extension, and the third round of extension will be carried out directly after the second round of extension is over.
Thirdly, why doesn't the state demolish and redistribute arable land?
In fact, the state continues to keep the previous data without making any changes, mainly for two reasons:
1) Benefit the older generation of farmers. In Document No. 1, the state clearly stated that farmers should enjoy the dividends of the country's reform and development. In order to revitalize all kinds of resources in the rural areas, so that the peasants can truly enjoy the benefits. The state will certainly give priority to the peasants who originally paid the public grain to enjoy the benefits. Then, keep the farmland contract unchanged to benefit the older generation of farmers.
2) Stabilizing land contract relations is conducive to agricultural development. In fact, in recent years, many rural areas have actively expanded the space for agricultural development, forming a large number of well-known agricultural science and technology companies, as well as agricultural professional cooperatives and even large producers. In this case, if the land contract relationship is changed, it is likely to have a big impact on these people who have been developing for many years or are developing and preparing to develop. In fact, precarious contracting relationships are a major blow to practitioner confidence. After all, starting an agricultural business is not a matter of one or two years, but a very long-term planning process. Therefore, it is necessary to demand the stability of the contractual relationship.
Even if additional arable land is allocated to some rural areas, there are three groups of people who do not have access to land. One is the peasants who sell their own arable land or **. They chose to give up arable land, which means that they would not have cultivated arable land in the first place. Therefore, there is no need to allocate arable land. The second category is those who destroy arable land. For example, in the countryside clandestine ** arable land or polluted arable land. The third category is those who change the use of cultivated land. For example, they plant trees on cultivated land or turn cultivated land into fish ponds.
In short, it is unlikely that there will be a redistribution of arable land in the countryside at the moment. However, for new farmland, people can go to the village collective to negotiate the contract. If you contract it yourself, farm it yourself. Then there is still a chance to be hired.