The Qi State, which was originally on the verge of extinction, achieved a shocking counterattack under Tian Dan's skillful control.
Tian Dan succeeded in driving away the Yan army, but a major question was placed in front of the Qi state: after the Yan army left, who should become the lord of the Qi state?
According to Zhongjun's theory, despite Tiandan's great contributions, the ultimate king of Qi should still be a descendant of King Qi. Some believe that with Tiandan's loyal vassal character, he will not try to usurp the throne.
However, Tian Dan finally found the crown prince who had fallen to the people, and put him on the throne. At that time, the people were simple, but was that really the case?
In the early Spring and Autumn period of more than 300 countries, only a few countries remained in the late Warring States period. Where did those disappeared countries go?Is it voluntary?
Why Tian Dan did not usurp the throne, it is difficult to find the answer from his heart. However, under environmental considerations, if Tian Dan really usurped the throne, the success would be extremely low.
The essence of power is to stand in line, and there are enough people to support Tian Dan, even if he doesn't want to be on top, he has to be on top. Tian Dan is similar to Guo Ziyi, with huge credit and huge power, but they have not taken the last step, because they are rational enough to know that the next step may be a catastrophe.
King Qi was killed by the Chu general, but the influence of the Tian Qi royal family did not diminish much. When Tiandan drove away the Yan army, the public opinion strongly demanded that the descendants of King Qi be found, and the state of Qi could not be without a leader.
The advisors around Tian Dan may have kept persuading him to replace him, and the opponents encouraged the people to cherish the nostalgia of King Qi and create concerns. Tian Dan chose to be loyal to the monarch and put the crown prince on the throne.
Perhaps in a conspiracy drama, some strategists kept persuading him to replace him, and the opponents evoked nostalgia for the king and created concerns. Tian Dan chose to be loyal to the monarch, but the prince was bewitched, and in the end, the monarch and the ministers solved the mustard and smiled.
However, the reality is naked. When there were enough people around Tiandan, a force pushed him to the throne. Tian Dan was suspicious of the prince's law chapter, and a good deed was misinterpreted, and the law chapter commended Tian Dan, showing the delicate relationship between the monarch and the minister.
Tian Dan eventually left Qi for Zhao, but did not cause waves in Qi. Maybe it's because he doesn't develop his personal power, or maybe it's because the law is suspicious of him. Tian Dan left, and the Qi country did not change much.
The story of Tian Dan is a game of power and loyalty. He may not have stepped onto the throne, but in the long course of history, his name will always be engraved in the glorious chapter of the Qi Kingdom.
The contest between power and loyalty: a review of "Tian Dan's Restoration of Qi State".
The article profoundly describes the choice between the power scheme and the loyalty that Tian Dan faced in the historical moment of the recovery of the Qi State. Tian Dan's story makes people think about how delicate and complex the struggle between power and loyalty is in history.
First of all, the article provides a profound analysis of why Tiandan did not usurp the throne. Starting from the character of a loyal minister, Tian Dan chose to put the crown prince on the throne, showing his deep understanding of the stability of the country and the pacification of the people. This choice may seem to give up personal power, but it has established the image of Tiandan's loyal servant in the long course of history. He not only pays attention to personal gains and losses, but also pays more attention to the long-term peace and stability of the country.
Secondly, the article depicts the game of power and loyalty in detail. Through the imagination of the conspiracy drama, the strategists and opponents around Tian Dan competed with each other, creating various plots, presenting a wonderful battle of conspiracy. This also triggers a comparison between power and loyalty in reality, and makes readers think more deeply about the power struggle in history.
The analogy between Tian Dan and Guo Ziyi in the article is also quite instructive. Both are figures with great merit and power, but they are not able to take the last step because they are sane enough. Behind this kind of rationality is a deep sense of responsibility to the country and the people. They may have given up their personal schemes, but they have gained the long-term peace and stability of the country. This quality of sacrificing personal interests and sticking to principles has made Tian Dan and Guo Ziyi exemplary figures in history.
At the end of the article, it is mentioned that Tian Dan left the Qi State, but it did not cause waves in the Qi State. This may indicate that Tian Dan's failure to fight for personal interests has not caused great changes inside and outside the country. However, it also makes one think that there may be moments in history when individual sanity and loyalty do not lead to the real revitalization of the country, and more decisive measures are needed.
Overall, this article takes the game of power and loyalty as a clue, and deeply analyzes Tian Dan's choices and decisions in the process of Qi recovery. Through the analysis of historical details, readers are prompted to think about the profound relationship between power and loyalty, personal gains and losses, and the rise and fall of the state. Such historical stories enable us to better understand the pressures and responsibilities behind the characters, and also inspire us to choose the times of power and loyalty.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!