Recently, the judgment document network released a ruling on the purchase of one construction exemption for three subjects, involving a case in which the examination exemption service of a construction engineering education company was sued. Plaintiff Mei contacted the company through a friend's introduction and paid a fee of 60,000 yuan to participate in the registered first-class constructor examination without taking the exam. However, during the exam, Mei found that because the false information provided was associated with the identity of others, even if she passed the exam, she could not use the certificate. As a result, Mei filed a lawsuit with the court for a refund of the fees. However, the court finally rejected Mei's prosecution and ruled to transfer the relevant materials to the investigating agency, finding that the case was suspected of forging official documents, certificates, seals and other crimes of state organs.
Mei is a beginner who wants to obtain the qualification of a first-class constructor. Through a friend's introduction, he learned that he could simplify the examination process by purchasing a service that exempts three subjects. So, he found Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company and signed the "2021 Registered Class I Constructor Signing Guarantee Class Agreement" with it. According to the agreement, Mei paid a fee of 60,000 yuan and was promised to be exempted from three subjects in the first-class constructor exam. Everything seemed to be going well, and Mei successfully signed up and took the exam through the company.
However, during the exam, Mei realized that the information she provided involved the use of other people's identity information, and whether he passed the exam or not, the certificate he eventually obtained would also be associated with someone else's certificate and could not be used normally. Mei was very worried and disappointed by this situation, and decided to file a lawsuit with the court and asked for a refund of the 60,000 yuan paid.
In court, Mei, as the plaintiff, filed his own claim, alleging that Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company failed to perform the provision of qualified examination exemption services, resulting in the impact of his examination qualifications and certificates. The defendant argued that during the registration process, they only registered based on the information provided by Mei, and did not bear the consequences of false information.
However, according to the evidence provided by the court and the WeChat chat records of both parties, Mei and Zhang Mouchao, the legal representative of the Construction Engineering Education Company, clearly stated in the chat the arrangement of exemption from the three subjects, and Zhang Mouchao also provided a false first-class construction engineer certificate for Mei to use. Accordingly, both parties agreed that the construction engineering education company had made false documents during the registration process and passed the review. Mei also took the exam.
After trial, the court ruled that the case was suspected of forging official documents, certificates, seals and other crimes of state organs. In accordance with the relevant provisions, the court rejected Mei's lawsuit and handed over the relevant materials to the investigating agency for further investigation. In addition, the court decided to return to him the 650 yuan that Mei had paid in advance for the case acceptance fee halved.
This case reveals the problems and risks in the market for Yijian's test-free services. By spending a certain amount of money, you can save the cumbersome process of taking the exam by purchasing a test exemption service. However, there are significant risks and legal risks involved in these so-called exemption services. Buyers often don't realize that while they may be able to pass the exam successfully, the credentials they receive are linked to someone else's credentials due to the use of false information. This situation is a deception and illegal act for the purchaser.
For beginners, obtaining the first-class constructor qualification is an important career development opportunity that needs to be fought for in a proper way. Therefore, when choosing an application agency, you should consider carefully to avoid falling into legal risks due to the pursuit of convenience. The best way is to take the exam through formal channels, and through your own hard work and strength, you can obtain the qualification, and the certificate obtained can really make a difference.
In addition, for similar exemption services, the relevant regulatory authorities should also strengthen supervision, investigate the responsibility of the violating institutions, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of candidates. Only by establishing a safe and reliable examination environment can the validity and fairness of the qualification of first-class constructor be truly guaranteed.
In short, this case is a wake-up call for us to be vigilant in our pursuit of convenience, to participate in exams legally and compliantly, and to strive to improve our abilities and gain real honor and recognition. Only in this way can we truly achieve our goal of professional development.