On January 6, 2021, a violent incident that shook the world took place at the U.S. Capitol. At that time, five people were killed and 140 injured when former Trump supporters stormed Congress in an attempt to prevent Congress from certifying Biden's election victory. The incident was considered a dark day for American democracy and also put Trump in a legal and political dilemma.
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court of Colorado made an unprecedented ruling, declaring that Trump was disqualified from participating in the state for 2024*** because of his participation in the "insurrection". The ruling sparked an uproar in the United States and plunged Trump's supporters and opponents into a bitter confrontation once again. Trump himself responded violently, calling it a "political **".
The legal basis and controversy of the Colorado ruling
The Colorado Supreme Court's decision on December 19 was based on the provisions of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Introduced after the American Civil War, the law was originally "designed" for Confederate officers and soldiers, stipulating that federal, state, and local** individuals who had sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution would not be allowed to hold public office if they were involved in an "insurrection or rebellion."
The court found that Trump, as a former **, had pledged allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, but he violated the law by inciting and supporting violent attacks on the U.S. democratic system during the Capitol riot and should be disqualified from running in the ** primary in Colorado.
The ruling has sparked a huge controversy in the United States, with two main points of view. On the one hand, proponents of the ruling argue that it is a just punishment for Trump and a defense of American democracy.
They believe that Trump played an inescapable role in the Capitol riot, not only refusing to recognize the election results, but also spreading lies, inciting supporters, threatening members of Congress, and even putting pressure on Deputy Pence to veto the electoral vote. They believe that Trump's actions have constituted an "insurrection" and should be punished by law, and he cannot run again**.
On the other hand, opponents of the ruling argue that it is a political ** against Trump and disrespectful to the American electorate. They argue that Trump did not directly participate in or direct the violence during the Capitol riot, but only expressed his doubts and dissatisfaction with the election results, which is his right to free speech as a U.S. citizen.
They argued that the provisions of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution only apply to the special circumstances of the Civil War, not to modern elections, and that the law does not explicitly stipulate how to disqualify candidates, so the court's ruling is unconstitutional.
They believe that Trump remains the leader of the Republican Party and the most powerful candidate for 2024, and that it is the voters, not the courts, who should decide his fate.
The Political Implications and Challenges of the Colorado Ruling in the United States
The Colorado ruling in the United States is undoubtedly a major blow to Trump's political future and a major test of the unity of the Republican Party. Trump himself responded violently, calling it a "political" and "vicious attack" by "the Democrats and their allies" to "prevent him from running again." He also said he would continue to fight for the principle of "America First" and would not succumb to "fanatics on the left."
Trump's response reflects his strong will for 2024*** and his confidence in his influence among the Republican Party and American voters. In fact, Trump remains the most popular figure in the Republican Party, with his supporters loyal to him, his donors generous to him, and his allies doing his talk.
According to the latest polls, Trump's Republican approval rating is as high as 68 percent, well ahead of other possible contenders such as Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and former Deputy Pence. However, Trump's political future has not been easy, and he faces not only legal challenges, but also political resistance.
Legally, the Colorado ruling, although limited to that state, could trigger other states to follow suit, causing Trump to be disqualified from running in more states, and may even be confirmed by the Supreme Court. Politically speaking, Trump's extreme rhetoric and behavior, although he has won the support of some core supporters, has also lost the trust of some moderate voters, resulting in his support across the country.
The holding rate is less than 50%. He also faces opposition within the Republican Party, with some moderate and anti-Trump Republicans, such as House Speaker Liz Cheney and Senator Mitt Romney, publicly criticizing his actions and refusing to support him running again.
The Social Impact and Implications of the Colorado Ruling in the United States
The Colorado ruling not only has a significant impact on Trump and the Republican Party, but also has far-reaching implications for American society and democracy. It reflects the polarization and antagonism of American politics, and also triggers Americans' thinking and debate about the electoral system and the judicial system.
On the one hand, this ruling could exacerbate the ** and conflict in American society, especially between Trump supporters and opponents. Trump's supporters see the ruling as a deprivation and violation of their democratic rights, an injustice and disrespect to their political idols, and a mockery and provocation of their beliefs and values.
On the other hand, this ruling may also promote reflection and reform in American society, especially in the electoral system and the judicial system. Although the U.S. electoral system has a long history and tradition, it also has some flaws and loopholes, such as the Electoral College system, the certification process of electoral votes, and the questioning and litigation of election results.
Conclusion
The Colorado ruling is an event of great significance and impact, which not only has a huge impact on Trump's political future and the internal unity of the Republican Party, but also poses a severe challenge and test to the social and democratic system of the United States.
This ruling may become a turning point in American history, or an opportunity, depending on how the American people and political leaders respond to and handle this incident, and how they can learn lessons and enlightenment from it to make better choices and decisions for the future and development of the United States.