Recently, U.S. federal prosecutors indicted an attempted assassination of a Sikh separatist in the United States. According to the published indictment, the mastermind behind the assassination was an Indian**. In this regard, it has aroused heated discussions in the outside world, and many people have said that this sensitive case may affect the relations between the United States and India. It is reported that this ** offered a reward of $100,000 for the assassination of New York City resident Gulpatwant Singh Pannon, speaking of Pannon, this person is not a simple person, he has dual citizenship of the United States and Canada, and promotes the establishment of a Sikh independent state "Khalistan" in India, which is regarded by the Indian side as "**
It is worth mentioning that this case is related to another assassination of Sikh separatist Nijjar in Canada. In June, Nijjar was attacked outside a Sikh cultural center in Surrey County, British Columbia, Canada. And it was because of Nijjar's killing that Canada and India were drawn into a diplomatic dispute. The Canadian side accused India of being involved in the case, but India did not admit it. Against the backdrop of mutual accusations between the two countries, both sides expressed their displeasure by expelling each other's diplomats, and even the Indian side imposed a visa ban on Canadian citizens.
Now, similar assassinations have happened again, and the United States blames India for the mastermind. Is there any evidence?In my opinion, it is no longer a matter of evidence or not, it is that the United States will aim its "gun" at India regardless of whether there is evidence or not. Aren't the United States and India good partners?In fact, the boat of friendship can be overturned. Not long ago, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi paid a visit to the United States, during which the United States seemed to hope that India would become its key ally in the Indo-Pacific region against China, and some voices even pointed out that the United States hoped that India would open a "second battlefield" in the Sino-US confrontation.
To put it bluntly, the United States expects India to force China to fight on two fronts. So will India say yes?A person familiar with the matter said that just after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the United States, the United States** expressed its dissatisfaction with the assassination of Sikhs to the Indian side. It is conceivable that if India promised the United States to become its key ally in the Indo-Pacific region against China, would the United States still treat India like this, accusing India of being behind the scenes?Therefore, it is very likely that India has rejected the US demand, so that the US is angry and "retaliates" against India in this way. India also has a day of standing in ChinaAt the end of the day, India is sober-minded and knows that even so, China will not be afraid. But what India did not expect was that it kindly persuaded the United States not to be stupid, because in the end the United States would turn against itself and "set itself on fire." It seems that for a country like the United States, there are no allies and partners at all, and if you don't listen to it, it will immediately attack you. (Dorae).