The 2024 village director is about to be canceledWho will take care of the countryside?**Specify 4 categories of candidates.
Dude, you know what?Recently, there has been news that the post of village director will be abolished in the rural areas, and the villagers' committees will directly manage the village affairs.
This can confuse grassroots governance. The village director is the core of the rural grassroots organizations, and without the village director, who will be in charge of the rural areas?
01 The history of the village director.
If you want to talk about the village director, it is a good thing left by the ancestors. As early as the beginning of the founding of the People's Republic of China, the post of village director was established.
In the past, village chiefs were selected according to who was a big family in the village and who had high prestige. At that time, the status of the village director was very high, and the village director basically had the final say in all the affairs of the village.
After the reform and opening up, the village chief became elected. However, due to historical reasons, many village chiefs are still hereditary, and it is not uncommon for the father to be handed down to the son.
In short, village chiefs have always played a pivotal role in rural grassroots governance. Many policies and affairs in the village need to be organized and implemented by the village chief.
02 Why do you want to abolish the village chief?
So the question is, since the village director is so important, why has there been a voice for the abolition of the village director in recent years?
The main reason is that in recent years, there have been too many shortcomings in rural grassroots governance, and many village directors have problems such as insufficient restraint on power and poor construction of a clean and honest government.
Some village chiefs are seriously familial, and they have long held the hegemony of the village and engaged in power-for-money transactions. There are even village chiefs who use their power and resources to benefit themselves.
As a result, rural governance is very non-standardized, and it is difficult to protect the interests of villagers.
Therefore, some experts and scholars have suggested that it is better to simply abolish the system of village directors and directly let the villagers' committee manage village affairs.
03 What kind of new model of rural management should China create?
Since it is imperative to abolish village chiefs, the question arises again: Who should be in charge of the management of the rural grassroots level?
*This time, 4 types of candidates were proposed to replace the position of village chief, the main ones are:
The first type is scientific and technological talents such as doctoral supervisors and academicians, who have professional knowledge to guide village cadres
The second category is honest and honest veterans, with a sense of discipline and organizational skills;
The third category is overseas returnees with advanced governance concepts and international vision;
The fourth category is the university student village officer, who is energetic and skilled.
These four types of people have their own role positioning, but they can all make up for the shortcomings of the current village director and help the rural areas achieve effective governance.
Through the introduction of diversified talents and the establishment of a power restraint mechanism, we hope to solve the long-standing problem of outstanding shortcomings at the grassroots level in rural areas and make the rural governance system more standardized and transparent.
This will play a positive role in further enhancing the ability and level of rural governance and safeguarding the interests of peasants.
From this point of view, the abolition of the village chief system may become a new attempt to reform rural grassroots governance.