In September 1948, after more than two years of fighting, the Chinese People's Liberation Army decided to launch the Liaoshen Campaign in the northeast to annihilate the enemy army and achieve complete liberation. Zhu Rui, the artillery commander of the Northeast Field Army, made great efforts to achieve this, but his heroic sacrifice did not make him included in the list of "36 military experts".
Zhu Rui studied in the Soviet Union in his early years and had a deep understanding of artillery technology. After joining the Chinese Communist Party, he held important positions during the Red Army period and accumulated rich military experience. During the Anti-Japanese War, Zhu Rui proposed the construction of an independent Chinese artillery unit, which was approved by the first party, and he quickly integrated a large number of artillery pieces, contributing to the earth-shaking changes in the scale of artillery in the Northeast Battlefield.
Zhu Rui made important preparations for the campaign to liberate the Northeast. However, when the Liaoshen Battle was about to start, Zhu Rui was killed by thunder, leaving a huge regret for the cause of the liberation of the Chinese people. ** He was praised for his contributions, calling him "Field Marshal of Artillery".
Although Zhu Rui performed well in the Liberation War, he was not included in the list of "36 military strategists". In this regard, people have speculated about the reason. One theory is that the criteria for selection were mainly the rank of general and above, and that Zhu Rui's position in the Red Army was not inferior to that of the inductee, so his qualifications seem to be sufficient. However, in fact, the selection criteria do not emphasize the need to reach the rank of general.
According to the selection criteria at that time, the main factors that determined the selection included early military experience, organizational and command ability during the revolutionary war, performance in senior leadership positions in the army, and important contributions to army building. Juri has made significant contributions in all of these areas, but he is not included in the list.
Zhu Rui served as a red officer during the Red Army.
1. Director of the Political Department of the Red Second Front Army, he served as the second deputy chief of staff in the command organ of the Eighth Route Army during the Anti-Japanese War. These positions were comparable to those of the inductees, but in the end, Juri was not selected, perhaps because he did not lead troops during the Revolution. However, this was not emphasized in the selection criteria.
Zhu Rui served in the political departments of the Red Army and the Eighth Route Army, and made great efforts to build and guide artillery units. His suggestions and efforts were substantively reflected in the Northeast Theater, but his heroic efforts ultimately failed to qualify him for the list of "36 Military Experts".
Zhu Rui was an outstanding military commander in the Chinese People's Liberation Army, and his contributions and bravery left a strong mark in the Liberation War. However, he was not selected into the list of "36 military experts", which may be due to the strict selection criteria and a historical regret. We should remember the contribution of this artillery marshal and let his deeds shine forever in the hearts of the people.
Zhu Rui's life as an artillery marshal is like a bright meteor, although it is short, it has left a brilliant brilliance. By reading about his deeds, one can't help but think deeply about his great contribution to the Liberation War and the regret of not being selected for the list of "36 military strategists".
First of all, Zhu Rui made outstanding contributions in artillery construction. In his early years, he studied in the Soviet Union, had a deep understanding of artillery technology, and proposed the construction of an independent Chinese artillery unit during the Anti-Japanese War. This initiative demonstrates his deep insight into modern warfare technology and his far-sighted vision for army building. With the support of ***, he successfully integrated a large number of artillery pieces, laying the foundation for the rise of artillery in the Northeast Theater.
However, his sacrifice in the Liaoshen Campaign became the highest-ranking military general lost by the people's army during the Liberation War, and he sacrificed his precious life for the cause of the country and the people. He not only showed valor in battle, but also made important proposals on artillery construction after the war. ** Evaluation of him, "If Zhu Rui is still alive, it is okay to award him a marshal based on his qualifications and merits." "Suffice it to prove his outstanding contribution in the military field.
However, Zhu Rui's failure to be included in the list of "36 military strategists" has triggered widespread speculation and thinking. The analysis of the selection criteria in the article shows that qualifications, contributions, and positions are the main aspects of the selection, and Zhu Rui seems to have the conditions for selection in these aspects. In particular, his positions in the Red Army and the Eighth Route Army were comparable to those of the inductees. As a result, people have wondered why he was not selected.
Perhaps, the strict selection criteria were one of the reasons why Zhu Rui was not selected. Throughout the selection process, it may be that the selection criteria at that time did not fully reflect the contributions and achievements of each stage of the Liberation War. Zhu Rui's important position in the Red Army, his outstanding contribution to artillery construction, and his military talent during the War of Liberation are all aspects that should be fully considered.
When commenting on Zhu Rui's life, we should not only remember his great contributions to the country and the people, but also deeply reflect on the fairness of the selection system for historical meritorious figures. Perhaps, this is also an important question that we need to consider when we understand history. Zhu Rui's deeds tell us that historical evaluation is complex and multifaceted, and more comprehensive, objective, and fair standards are needed to ensure that heroic military generals can receive the credit they deserve and set an example for future generations.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!