The mobile phone SOC ladder list is a list ranked according to the performance of the mobile phone processor, taking into account the performance of the CPU and GPU. Recently, an organization released the latest ranking results for December. It can be clearly seen from the list that the current top two mobile phone SoCs are MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8Gen3, while Apple's A17Pro can only rank third. This result has attracted a lot of attention and discussion.
Although Apple's A17 Pro is currently the only mobile phone SoC on the market with a 3nm process, its performance is not as strong as the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3. This situation shows that the process of the chip is not the only factor that determines the strength of the performance, and the key lies in the optimization of design and structure. This also gives people a revelation, that is, when choosing a mobile phone, we should not only look at the advanced nature of the process, but also consider the comprehensive performance of other factors.
In the past, people often thought that Apple's A-series chips were ahead of the Android phone generation. However, starting with the A16 chip, this myth has been shattered. Apple's release of the A16 chip last year basically announced the end of this situation. Today's mobile phone SOC ladder ranking results also prove once again that Apple chips and Android chips have long been equal in terms of performance. Therefore, when buying a mobile phone, we do not have to chase too much after a certain model with fictitious advantages, but make a choice based on our needs and preferences.
The ladder chart is ranked according to the running score of the mobile phone processor, and from this point of view, the running score is a relatively fair indicator. However, the mobile phone experience is not only limited to the level of running scores, but also affected by ecology, system, optimization and other aspects. For example, some people praise the smoothness of the Huawei Mate60 series as much as Apple's iPhone 15 Pro, and the chips of these two phones are actually 4 generations apart. This shows that when buying a mobile phone, we need to consider all factors, not just the score.
The vast majority of people do not perform drastic calculations or play large games when they use their mobile phones in their daily lives, they are more likely to play**, send text messages, surf the Internet, take photos and browse social networks**. In this case, the mid-range and above mobile phone chips are enough for daily needs, and the difference in performance is not too obvious. Therefore, for this part of the population, the ranking results of the ladder chart actually do not have much reference significance.
When choosing a mobile phone chip, we should not only refer to the ranking results of the ladder chart, but also judge it in combination with personal usage scenarios and needs. If you often play large games and perform large computing power calculations, then a chip with stronger performance is undoubtedly a better choice. However, for the vast majority of people, they are more concerned about the smoothness of daily use, when the mid-range and above chips are already able to meet the needs, and the difference will not be too obvious.
All in all, the mobile phone SOC ladder list is a reference for the performance of the mobile phone processor, but it is not the only criterion for judging. When buying a mobile phone, we should consider a number of factors, including chip performance, ecosystem, degree of optimization, etc., to choose the right phone for you.