Recently, a report on the comprehensive strength ranking of China's provincial capitals has attracted widespread attention.
The report mainly considers factors such as the GDP of each city, and divides the provincial capital cities into six grades, showing the development level and potential of each city.
Guangzhou became the leader in the first gear, and Chengdu, Hangzhou, Wuhan, Nanjing, Taipei and other cities also ranked in the second tier, becoming the leader among the provincial capitals.
These cities have outstanding performance in economic development and scientific and technological innovation, showing strong comprehensive strength.
Although the comprehensive strength of Xi'an, Changsha, Zhengzhou, Jinan, Hefei and other cities in the third tier is at a medium level, they have shown great development potential and have attracted much attention.
However, the fourth tier composed of provincial capitals such as Fuzhou, Shenyang, Kunming, Changchun, and Nanchang performed mediocre in the comprehensive strength ranking, and needs to be strengthened for development.
Provincial capitals such as Harbin, Shijiazhuang, Nanning, Taiyuan, Guiyang, and Lanzhou are in the fifth tier, with relatively weak comprehensive strength and urgent need to accelerate development.
The comprehensive strength of provincial capitals such as Urumqi, Hohhot, Haikou, Xining, Yinchuan, and Lhasa in the last tier is relatively weak, and it is necessary to increase the intensity of opening up and industrial transformation.
This ranking report helps to understand the overall strength of provincial capitals more objectively, and provides an important reference for the development planning and policy formulation of relevant cities.
It is hoped that all cities can strengthen development, improve their comprehensive strength, and make greater contributions to national development according to their own actual conditions.