Find out the shortcomings and make the constitution the people's umbrella On December 2, **TV** set up a section of the spirit of the constitution**. This has sparked heated discussions among the majority of netizens, making us seriously think about the application and protection of the Constitution in daily life. ** shows a traffic police officer using excessive force against a cyclist who violates traffic rules in the course of law enforcement, raising public questions about law enforcement and concerns about police power. We should think deeply about this, find out the root cause of the problem, and find solutions to ensure that the Constitution becomes a true umbrella for the people.
* A traffic police officer did not indicate in advance to stop for inspection when dealing with illegal cyclists, which is a clear violation. And without signaling, the traffic police quietly hid aside with skillful movements, waited for the cyclist to approach, and suddenly used a baton to knock him down. Not only is this behavior not warned, but the illegal use of batons is a complete violation of law enforcement norms. Moreover, the traffic police were there to check whether the cyclists were wearing helmets to ensure their safety, but they treated the violators violently, sending them to the hospital. This is clearly putting the cart before the horse and a grave violation of the law and human rights.
All are equal before the law. We can no longer defend the alleged illegal actions of this traffic policeman, he has already committed a crime. Moreover, his crime was not an unintentional mistake, but a deliberate violation of the law in the course of law enforcement. This is not an isolated case, as some organizations specialize in acts that endanger the safety of the people in the name of serving the safety of the people. This phenomenon is not uncommon all around us. Is everything this traffic policeman did in vain?But is such enforcement legitimate?Most people don't approve of such behavior because they confuse concepts.
Violations should be divided into two types: minor violations and serious violations. Minor offenses include not wearing a helmet, etc., while serious offenses include intentional homicide, etc. These two are completely different concepts. It is a citizen's freedom to wear a helmet or not, and it is unreasonable to force helmets to be mandatory. The helmet only serves as a protector at critical moments and does not cause any harm to society or others. Therefore, the mandatory helmet mandate should be abolished. The duty of the traffic police is to serve the people, to clear traffic, not to harm the people. Since electric vehicles are recognized as non-motorized vehicles, why is it mandatory to wear helmets?Isn't it a contradiction that bikes don't need to wear helmets?
We can't use safety as an excuse, people can also be hit by falling objects while walking, so should it also be mandatory to wear safety helmets?We need to think holistically about this question. The constitution guarantees the legitimate rights and interests of the people, and the police are one of the enforcers of the constitution. Their duty is to protect the people, not to harm them. Therefore, we should strictly supervise and manage the behavior of the traffic police, ensure that they perform their duties in accordance with the law, and maintain good social order while protecting the safety of the people. To sum up, this paragraph has raised questions about traffic police law enforcement and concerns about the strength of constitutional protection.
We should conscientiously study Xi spirit of the Constitution, find out the problems that exist therein, and actively seek solutions. While maintaining social order and protecting people's safety, the legality and compliance of police actions should not be overlooked. Only through rational systems and norms can we ensure that the Constitution truly becomes the people's protective umbrella. What do you think we should do to solve the problem of traffic police law enforcement?How to balance the relationship between power and freedom while protecting the safety of the people?
Welcome to leave a message to discuss!Hit someone to injury, the police will also be punished according to the law Recently, a ** went viral on the Internet, a man in a police uniform chased a man riding an electric car with a baton, knocked him to the ground, and then continued to beat. The man's actions have attracted attention and condemnation. Why can police officers use batons to beat people at will?Is this behavior legal?We need to reflect on this enforcement and lawlessness. In China, it is illegal to ride an electric vehicle without a helmet. But if you are injured by a baton-wielding man, will he also be punished by the law?
The policeman's actions were not only contrary to the law, but also extremely violent. We must severely punish such premeditated and purposeful violations and crimes, and we must never tolerate them. Hitting someone to the point of injury is a very serious crime. For law enforcement personnel such as the police, it is all the more necessary to act in accordance with the law and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the people. If the police can beat the people like **, then the justice of society and the authority of the rule of law will be shaken. Therefore, we must remain calm and rational in the process of enforcing the law, and handle cases in accordance with the law.
For the problem of electric vehicles not wearing helmets, we should guide people to wear helmets correctly, rather than simply mandatory. After all, adults have their own rights and the right to make their own choices. If we could do a better job of advocacy and education, then this offense could be reduced. Finally, with regard to the problem of police beating people with batons, we not only need to investigate those responsible, but also need to further improve laws and regulations and strengthen the supervision and management of the police. Only in this way can we ensure that law enforcement is fair and the legal system is orderly.
What are your thoughts on this matter?Comments are welcome**!