The scientific and technological level of the ancient army is completely different from that of the modern army, and there are significant differences in both the nature of combat and the will to fight. On the ancient battlefield, soldiers relied on their unwavering morale to drive the tide of battle, and once their morale collapsed, it was difficult to win even if they were strong. In contrast, modern armies focus more on technical equipment and do not place too much emphasis on the willpower of warriors as in ancient times.
In the Korean War, there was a huge gap between the volunteers and the U.S. military, but the determination of the volunteers to see death as their home was rare in ancient times. This determination allowed the volunteers to successfully drive the American troops out of the 38th parallel, although they had already prepared for the huge ** in the face of the huge disparity.
Now, let's assume that 10,000 special forces carry heavy ** back to ancient times, can they wipe out the 100,000 army?The answer is not simple, and there are two possibilities.
One is crushing, where the special forces face the bows, shields, and swords of ancient soldiers, and almost form a one-sided ** under the violent pouring of modern **. Even if the ancient army was given a large number of bows and arrows and ballistas, it was difficult to change the outcome. However, the premise of this answer is that the supply of special forces must be sufficient, otherwise the offensive of the crowd tactics will make it lose its ability to counterattack, which will lead to defeat.
Another possibility is that the ancient army won, and the special forces carried limited heavy materials, such as only 30 rounds of ammunition for rifles and only a few dozen shells for tanks. If the two sides are locked in a protracted war, the special forces will inevitably consume supplies when they need to defend. The opponent can skillfully use the art of war, terrain, climate and other factors to gradually deplete the resources in the hands of the special forces, so that they will eventually be unable to resist.
The wisdom of the ancients was superb, and they were good at using the art of war, terrain, climate and other means to disintegrate the opponent's formation through tactics such as fire attack and water attack in the face of a strong enemy, and break them one by one until the last person was captured. Therefore, the key to the victory of special forces on the ancient battlefield lies in heat. Without the support of modern **, the special forces would be caught in hand-to-hand combat, and there would be almost no chance of winning in the face of the experience and strength of the ancient soldiers.
While modern armies theoretically have the ability to crush ancient armies, it is not easy to do so. The special forces traveled through the ancient battlefield, between the crushing of science and technology and the bitter battle, the balance of victory and defeat is still difficult to tilt.
This article provides in-depth thinking about the scene of special forces crossing ancient battlefields, and fully demonstrates the huge differences between ancient and modern military technology and tactics. By comparing morale, determination, and technical equipment, the author provokes the reader to think about the possibilities of confrontation between the armies of the two eras.
First of all, the article profoundly points out the characteristics of ancient armies and emphasizes the key role of morale in ancient warfare. This is well confirmed by the performance of the volunteer army in the Korean War. In contrast, the modern military pays more attention to scientific and technological equipment, which makes there is a significant difference between the two in terms of war motivation and willpower. This difference affects not only the tactical level, but also the understanding and pursuit of the goals of war.
Secondly, the author cleverly envisions the scenario of the special forces returning to the ancient battlefield, making two different speculations about the possible outcome. This scenario has both the possibility of technological crushing and the possibility of victory of the ancient army in the case of limited materials. This analysis provokes the reader to think about the trade-offs between technology and strategy in warfare. At the same time, emphasizing the critical role of the special forces in this scenario provides a clear argument for the entire analysis.
Finally, the article's depiction of the wisdom of the ancient people and their flexible use of military techniques, terrain and other factors makes ancient warfare not a simple comparison of forces, but also a contest of wisdom and tactics. It also makes people think that although the development of technology can bring great advantages in warfare, the use of wisdom and strategy is also crucial.
Overall, this article profoundly examines the interplay of technology and strategy in warfare through a comparison between ancient and modern armies, as well as the idea of special forces returning to the ancient battlefield. After reading the article, people have more thoughts about the nature of war, the importance of technology and wisdom.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!