Israel** suddenly announced that it had ratified a temporary ceasefire agreement with Hamas and announced that it would suspend operations in the Gaza Strip for four days. However, while a ceasefire was expected, the IDF launched a massive attack on Hamas. According to Russian media reports, Israeli military aircraft launched airstrikes on more than 300 Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip in just 24 hours, including military command centers, ** warehouses and *** underground tunnels. According to the IDF, the objectives are to combat Hamas's terrorist activities and ensure Israel's security.
It is worth noting that Israel** suddenly changed its tune and launched an attack on Hamas when the ceasefire came into effect, which raised questions from the outside world. Analysts believe that Israel may be setting off a "smokescreen" to deliberately confuse the public. In the face of the international community's call for a ceasefire and Israel's strong demand for the release of the hostages, Israel had to make concessions, and the so-called ceasefire agreement should be just a strategy to gain a certain amount of international support.
According to the ceasefire agreement, Hamas should release the captured Israeli hostages, while Israel** promised to extend the ceasefire. However, before Israel officially stated that a truce could be made, Israel** also made it clear that it supported a ceasefire. This means that Israel's position on the ceasefire is not consistent, and there are some internal differences.
However, after the official Israeli statement, Israeli *** adviser Hanegbi issued another statement late at night, saying that negotiations on the release of the hostages were ongoing and progressing, but specific actions would be postponed until after the 24th. However, Hanegby did not disclose the reason for the postponement, further adding to the uncertainty surrounding the event.
Despite the fact that the ceasefire agreement can be widely supported by the international community, Israel** does not act according to the "rules". On several occasions, they have rejected the mediation of States and have taken a mid-flirtatious attitude towards the "idea of occupation" in Gaza. As can be seen from this behaviour, Israel may not really want a ceasefire and is using this opportunity to continue its offensive in Gaza.
It has been commented that if the parties can follow the rules and build trust, it may be possible to exchange prisoners and hostages, and hopefully end the war. However, it now seems that some people do not agree with this, and they continue to support the attitude of continuing to fight.
In such a complex situation, the conflict between Israel and Hamas shows no signs of stopping. Israel's rhetoric and large-scale attacks on Hamas have put the ceasefire agreement that had already been reached in limbo. Contradictions and uncertainties in the attitude and actions of the parties regarding the ceasefire make the resolution of the conflict more difficult.
However, both Israel and Hamas should proceed from a humanitarian point of view, respect the ceasefire agreement, and avoid further conflict and**. It is only through dialogue and compromise that a viable way to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict can be sought. The international community should also strengthen its good offices and mediation to provide support and guarantees for the implementation of the ceasefire agreement.
At the same time, we should also be aware that behind the conflict lies complex political, historical and religious issues, which are not just frictions between the two sides, but also a deep-rooted contradiction. Only through global efforts to promote the settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict can we contribute to peace and stability in the Middle East.