Recently, a divorce lawsuit triggered by a wife installing a locator to test her husband's loyalty has attracted widespread attention. Mr. Liu and Lulu are a young couple who have been married for three years and have lived happily ever after. However, as time went on, Mr. Liu began to return late frequently, which made his wife Lulu suspicious. In order to test her husband's loyalty, Lulu installed a locator under Mr. Liu's car without her husband's consent.
This behavior aroused Mr. Liu's strong disgust. He believes that the itinerary information is his private information, and his wife has obviously gone too far by doing so. Mr. Liu said that if there is no basic trust between husband and wife, then what is the meaning of marriage?In the face of her husband's questioning, Lulu frankly admitted her actions and said that she had indeed suspected her husband, but after checking for a while, she found that her husband was really going to socialize, so she never used the locator again. However, Mr. Liu did not agree with his wife's explanation and was unwilling to forgive.
After much deliberation, Mr. Liu decided to file a lawsuit with the court. He believed that his wife's installation of the tracker violated his right to privacy and personal information, so he claimed that Lu should be ordered to pay 10,000 yuan in compensation for mental damages. At the same time, Mr. Liu also filed a divorce lawsuit. This incident has aroused widespread concern and discussion from all walks of life.
According to the lawyer, natural persons have the right to privacy. The privacy rights of others must not be infringed upon by any organization or individual through methods such as espionage, intrusion, leakage, or disclosure. Privacy refers to the tranquility of a natural person's private life and the private space, private activities, and private information that they do not want others to know. The provisions on privacy are applicable to the private information in personal information.
In this case, although Mr. Liu and Lulu are husband and wife, they are relatively independent civil subjects in the legal sense. Therefore, it does not mean that the two parties can arbitrarily infringe on each other's private space without the other party's permission, and spy on and obtain each other's private information. Although Lulu claimed that she had not used the locator for a long time, her practice had violated Mr. Liu's rights. As for Mr. Liu's claim that the installation of the locator may lead to the infringement of his right to health and property rights, this is obviously inconsistent with the elements of tort liability stipulated in the law.
This incident reminds us once again that marriage needs to be based on mutual respect and trust. When faced with doubts and confusion, couples should communicate openly and rationally solve problems. It is not advisable to test the loyalty of the other party by installing a locator, etc., which will not only compromise the other party's privacy and personal information rights, but can also lead to serious consequences of marriage breakdown. It is hoped that all couples can cherish each other's feelings and trust, and work together to maintain family harmony and happiness.