Has Huawei really become a threat to U.S. defense?At the most recent annual U.S. defense forum, Raimondo's remarks caused another uproar. She called on the U.S. to increase its budget in response to China's rise in semiconductors. But can this approach really work?In fact, when China is faced with US sanctions, it has always been able to respond unexpectedly with practical actions. In contrast, the U.S. blockade does not seem to have brought China to its knees, but rather accelerated China's autonomy in related areas. As a representative of China's semiconductor industry, Huawei has not only successfully responded to the sanctions imposed by the U.S. Department of Commerce, but also made considerable progress in the research and development of its own chips.
This has caused chip companies in the United States and the West to lose a lot of money, and may even lose this huge market after Huawei achieves autonomy. The U.S. crackdown seems to be "adding fuel to the fire" for the autonomy of China's semiconductor industry. So is the US approach wise or stupid?Is Raimondo's statement in line with the national interest of the United States?Let's take a look at this question together. With the rapid development of technology, the competition in the field of semiconductors has become increasingly fierce. And China's rise in this field has undoubtedly brought tremendous pressure to Western countries. However, will the U.S. crackdown be effective?It is understood that the U.S. Department of Commerce's sanctions on Huawei have led to losses for U.S. and Western chip companies
On the other hand, in the face of US suppression, China's semiconductor industry continues to accelerate the process of independence, does this mean that the US suppression is backfired?And will Raimondo's remarks have a positive impact on the national interests of the United States?After all, if China's semiconductor industry does become autonomous, it will be a major competitor to the United States and the West, and is it in the long-term interests of the United States?Therefore, we need to think seriously about this issue and not make rash judgments. Of course, the answer to this question is not simple. Both the United States and China need to find their own development path in international competition. In response to China's rise in the semiconductor field, the United States may need to re-examine its China policy.
Whether Raimondo's remarks represent the national interests of the United States also needs more discussion and argumentation. I believe that the answer to this question will gradually emerge over time.