The CBA announced the timing and rules of the All-Star vote, but it sparked countless dissatisfaction. Only players who have played an average of 15 minutes or more at the end of the 20th round of the regular season will be selected. And now the CBA has completed 18 rounds, and the 19th round is underway. This means that if a player doesn't play enough minutes due to injuries or other reasons, he won't be able to play in the All-Star Game. Such a rule clearly has a lot of loopholes that could hurt All-Star attention. Although Allen Guo can participate in the All-Star Game as a substitute, it is still a big pity that he cannot become a starter. Did the CBA not take this issue into account when making its rules?Will such controversy continue?
The main purpose of the article: There are many disputes about CBA rules, and referees throw the blame, which affects the development of the league. When the rules of a league are not satisfactory to the fans and the **, then it will cause a lot of controversy and dissatisfaction. The CBA is an example of this, and in recent years, the voting for various rules such as MVP and All-Star has attracted a lot of controversy. And the referee often becomes the "dark force" in the mouth of fans. Yesterday, the CBA's response to the referee also caused a lot of heated discussions, and it seemed to be "dumping" fans and **. But doing so is not only irresponsible, but also has a negative impact on the development of the league. As the highest level of basketball league in China, the fairness and rationality of the rules of the CBA are obviously particularly important.
However, in recent years, the voting of various rules has attracted a lot of controversy, especially the voting of MVP, and many fans feel that these rules are not fair. In addition, the referee has also become a "dark force" in the hearts of fans, and there are always a large number of misjudgments, which call into question the fairness of the game. These controversies not only cause discontent among fans, but also have a negative impact on the development of the league. Yesterday, the CBA's response to the referee, in the eyes of fans, seemed to be "dumping" them. The CBA said, "The referee has improved, you have to accept it", "Fans and ** should be tolerant", "A misjudgment is fine, it will not affect the outcome of the game".
Such a response is clearly not responsible enough, and is more like passing the buck. If the CBA is not able to take the issue of adjudication seriously from an impartial standpoint, its image and credibility will be damaged. At the same time, if the league cannot continue to improve and meet the needs of fans and **, its attention will also be difficult to increase. In general, CBA rules controversies and referee issues have always been the focus of fans' attention. In recent years, the controversy over various voting rules and the misjudgment of the referee have made fans dissatisfied. And yesterday's CBA's response to the referee's question made many fans feel "dumping". CBAs need to take these issues seriously and take their responsibilities seriously.
At the same time, it is also necessary to continue to improve to meet the needs of fans and leaders, so that the attention and development level of the league continue to improve.