Israel begins its attack on Lebanon!A war on both sides, can Allah withstand it?

Mondo International Updated on 2024-01-31

In December 2023, Israel decided to turn to Lebanon after its military operation in Gaza, launching a series of air strikes and ground incursions aimed at weakening and eventually eliminating the armed forces of Allah in Lebanon and occupying territory in southern Lebanon. Behind this military conflict are Israel's concerns about Allah's rocket and mortar threats, as well as strategic considerations to try to sever ties between Allah and Hamas.

Israel** claims that they are acting in self-defence, to prevent Allah from launching attacks into Israel and to maintain the security of the country. According to the Israeli side, Allah's rocket attacks have become a threat that cannot be ignored, threatening not only civilians in southern Israel, but also potentially undermining regional security and stability. In addition, Israel** has expressed concern about the close ties between Allah and Hamas, which it believes could lead to broader regional instability.

However, Allah in Lebanon has resolutely resisted Israel's military action and has said that it will defend its territory and its population. A spokesman for Allah accused Israel of aggression and said it was a violation of Lebanese sovereignty. They declared that Allah would resolutely resist the Israeli military invasion and defend the dignity of Lebanon. In addition, Allah has threatened to retaliate against Israeli military actions by launching retaliatory attacks on towns in northern Israel.

In this conflict, innocent civilians have been the biggest victims. The United Nations, the United States, and other international community agencies and countries have expressed their concern and condemnation of the conflict. All parties called on Israel and Lebanon to cease hostilities and to seek a peaceful solution to avoid further humanitarian crises and personnel**.

In the face of the strong reaction of the international community, Israel** stated that it had acted in self-defence and had exercised maximum restraint in the conduct of its military operations in order to reduce the impact on civilians. However, some international human rights organizations have questioned Israel's air strikes and ground incursions, accusing them of unnecessary harm to civilians and demanding that the international community investigate and hold them accountable.

For its part, Lebanon categorically rejects Israel's explanations and considers Israel's actions to be a grave violation of international law. In a statement, a spokesman for Allah accused Israel of using unrestrained force, resulting in the death and injury of a large number of innocent civilians. They urged the international community to take a more active stance to compel Israel to cease its aggression and to seek a solution to the dispute through dialogue.

In the course of the conflict, both sides are trying to enlist international support in the information war. Israel**, through the International, stressed their position of self-defence, emphasizing that Allah's attacks on Israel were the main reasons for the outbreak of the conflict. Allah, on the other hand, appealed to the international community for support through social media and news channels, portraying Israel as an aggressor, in serious violation of international law.

In the face of constant pressure from the international community, the United Nations has actively intervened in an attempt to promote a ceasefire and negotiations between the two sides. The Council has met on a number of occasions to discuss the progress of the conflict and has issued statements strongly condemning the hostilities between the two sides. The Secretary-General has stated that he is personally committed to brokering peace negotiations to resolve the crisis.

As one of the main allies in the Middle East, the United States has also joined the mediation ranks of the international community. The United States expressed its support for Israel while urging Israel to do everything possible to reduce harm to civilians and to cooperate with the United Nations in the search for a peaceful solution. At the same time, the United States is working with other countries to provide humanitarian assistance to both sides to help alleviate the humanitarian crisis caused by the conflict.

Hundreds of people were killed, thousands injured and a large amount of property was destroyed in the conflict. Civilians have fallen victim to innocence, both in Israel and in Lebanon. Damage to medical facilities and infrastructure has led to a dramatic exacerbation of the humanitarian crisis, with tens of thousands of people forced to flee their homes and seek safe shelter.

The conflict has aroused widespread concern from the international community and strong condemnation of all parties to the conflict. Humanitarian organizations have called for much-needed assistance to meet the basic needs of people living in affected areas, including food, water and medical care. The United Nations and its related agencies play a key coordinating and assisting role in crises in an effort to alleviate the suffering caused by humanitarian disasters.

Against this backdrop, the international community is increasingly calling for a peaceful solution. The United Nations put forward a ceasefire initiative early in the crisis and called on the parties to resolve their differences through dialogue and negotiation. At the same time, all parties are feeling strong pressure from the international community to work together to resolve disputes through dialogue in order to end the violent conflict.

Facilitated by international mediation, both sides expressed their willingness to consider a ceasefire. However, there are still many difficulties in achieving peace, because the contradictions between the parties and the problems left over from the past still exist. Allah insisted that Israel immediately cease its military operations and withdraw from Lebanese territory, while Israel offered to secure its own *** and prevent threats from Lebanon.

At this critical juncture, the international mediators are trying to bring the parties to dialogue on a mutually recognized basis in order to resolve the underlying issues of the dispute. As a result of numerous talks and consultations, the parties gradually began to discuss the terms of the ceasefire and the future regional security mechanism. At the same time, the international community is also assisting the two sides in building bridges of mutual trust and promoting the smooth progress of the peace process.

However, the complexity and deep-seated problems of the conflict make it difficult to reach a peaceful solution. There is still a deep perception of historical hatred on all sides, making it more difficult to compromise and work together. In addition, the influence and interests of other countries in the region have increased the complexity of peace negotiations, making it necessary for all parties to balance domestic and international factors.

In this process, the role of the international community is reflected not only in the mediation of negotiations, but also in the monitoring and support of the peace process. International organizations, non-governmental organizations and relevant countries have worked together to convey their expectations for peace to the parties to the conflict, through diplomatic channels and public declarations, and to urge them to reach a sustainable agreement as soon as possible.

Reconstruction and assistance to victims and affected communities has also become an urgent task. The international community has provided substantial assistance aimed at helping to restore damaged infrastructure, rebuild homes, provide emergency medical care and support the economic recovery of those affected. In doing so, international aid agencies work closely with local** and communities to ensure that aid reaches where it is needed most quickly and effectively.

Overall, the international community's concern and actions regarding the Israeli-Lebanese conflict have been confined to condemnation, but have been reflected in active good offices, assistance and peace-building. Despite the challenges of the conflict, the efforts of the international community have brought a glimmer of peace to the region. With the joint efforts of all parties, it is hoped that lasting peace can be achieved in the future and more favorable conditions will be created for regional stability and prosperity.

Related Pages