Recently, there has been an endless stream of articles on the history of the Ming Dynasty, and as an examiner, I always need to cite history books to support my views. Among them, "History of the Ming Dynasty" is one of the most commonly cited history books by me, but every time "History of the Ming Dynasty" is mentioned, a group of opponents will emerge in the comment area, and their core point is that "The History of the Ming Dynasty was written by the Manchu Qing Dynasty and was specifically used to discredit my Ming Dynasty, so it is not credible."
It's a really infuriating and funny point of view. Today, I'm going to dispel a rumor about this "menstrual patch".
First of all, we must understand a tradition of historical revision: the new dynasty repairs the old history. Since the Taishi Company moved in, all dynasties have followed this tradition. If someone proposed to write the "History of the Ming Dynasty" during the Ming Dynasty, it would inevitably meet with strong opposition from the imperial court, because it was an act of undermining orthodoxy.
Among the 24 histories, the compilation level of the "History of the Ming Dynasty" can be called the first-rate. But why would anyone question it?The key lies in the compilation of the Qing Dynasty, is the "History of the Ming Dynasty" not credible?
Examining history, we find that the revision of history is not new. For example, the revision of the "Yuan History" can be described as a miracle. As soon as Zhu Yuanzhang ascended the throne, he issued an edict to revise the "History of the Yuan". But at that time, the Northern Expeditionary Army was still on the way, and the documents of the Yuan Dynasty were waiting in the dust of Dadu (present-day Beijing). It wasn't until Xu Da hurriedly sent back all kinds of materials that the "History of the Yuan" officially began, and it took only 188 days to complete. In order to check and fill in the gaps, Zhu Yuanzhang reopened the historical situation in the third year of Hongwu, and spent another 143 days to complete the "Yuan History" we see today.
A similar situation appears in the History of the Song Dynasty. In the third year of Zhizheng, when there were only 25 years left before the fall of the Great Yuan Dynasty, Emperor Yuan Shun was suddenly anxious and asked the prime minister to get a copy of the "History of the Song Dynasty" quickly. In two and a half years, he not only completed the "History of the Song Dynasty", but also piggybacked on the "History of Liao" and "History of Jin".
Why are Zhu Yuanzhang and Tu Timur so anxious to revise history?The reasons may be different, but the purpose is the same: to assert one's own legitimacy. Zhu Yuanzhang wants to establish the orthodox image of the Ming Dynasty in **, while the Tuo Timur wants to deny the call for the "Song Dynasty" and promote the legitimacy of the Great Yuan.
In order to maintain legitimacy, the Spring and Autumn period sometimes had to be used. The Chenqiao Mutiny is a typical example, the shameless surnamed Zhao forcibly robbed the family property of the orphans and widows of the Chai family. How can this kind of thing be round?When revising the "History of the Old Five Dynasties", Xue Juzheng could only use the Spring and Autumn Period, not in advance, but only about the consequences, so that Zhao Kuangyin looked like he was coerced by the rebellious army before he was added to the yellow robe, and subjectively did not have the intention of usurping the king with ministers.
To sum up, historical revision is not just an objective record, but also a part of political conspiracy. The legitimacy of the History of the Ming Dynasty is undeniable, and the view of doubting its authenticity is often a misreading of the tradition of historical revision. Behind every history book is a consideration of political intrigue and legitimacy, and to understand history, we need to see more layers.
The historical truth that cannot be ignored, why is the History of the Ming Dynasty still an orthodox book?The inside story of the history that you absolutely don't know is revealed!
Why is the History of the Ming Dynasty still an orthodox book?The inside story of the history that you absolutely don't know is revealed!This article profoundly analyzes the tradition of historical revision and the political conspiracy behind the revision of history by various dynasties and generations. With vivid language and detailed examples, the author vigorously defends the legitimacy of the History of the Ming Dynasty, and at the same time reveals the complexity and politicization of historical revision.
First of all, the article mentions the tradition of revising history in all dynasties, emphasizing the unshakability of the new dynasty in revising the old history. This tradition has continued since Ma Qian, the Taishi company, founded the "Records of the Historians" and is part of China's history and culture. By citing the example of Li Shimin, Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, who compiled the Book of Sui during the Eastern Han Dynasty, the author clearly expresses the tradition of historical revision, which also lays the foundation for the later explanation of why the History of the Ming Dynasty is still an orthodox book.
Secondly, through detailed historical examples, such as the miraculous speed of the History of the Yuan Dynasty and the urgency of the History of the Song Dynasty, the article shows the maintenance of legitimacy in different contexts of the revision of history in previous dynasties. In order to fight for the first position and emphasize the orthodox status of their own dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang and Tu Timur respectively revised the "History of the Yuan" and "History of the Song Dynasty". This also confirms the reason why the History of the Ming Dynasty is still an orthodox book mentioned in the article, that is, the history of all dynasties was revised to maintain the legitimacy of the new dynasty.
The article further analyzes the Spring and Autumn brushwork of the Chenqiao Mutiny, and shows that in order to maintain the orthodox image, some rhetorical techniques have been adopted in all dynasties, by weakening the faults of the former monarchs and highlighting the helplessness of the later monarchs, so as to make history more in line with the orthodox conspiracy. This also gives readers a deeper understanding of the means and purposes of historical revision.
Finally, the article concludes with another emphasis on the political game of historical revision. Through the analysis of the legitimacy of the History of the Ming Dynasty, readers can look at history more rationally and realize that behind each history book there are political scheming and legitimacy considerations. Such in-depth analysis and objective analysis make the reader's understanding of history revision more comprehensive and in-depth.
Overall, this review is critical to "Why is the History of the Ming Dynasty still an orthodox book?".The inside story of the history that you absolutely don't know is revealed!made a full and powerful affirmation. Through the in-depth analysis of the historical revision tradition discussed in the article and the political conspiracy behind the historical revision of various dynasties, it not only helps readers better understand the complexity of historical revision, but also improves their understanding of the legitimacy of the History of the Ming Dynasty.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!