After a US military plane crashed in Japan, Japan** demanded that the US military ground all planes of the same type as soon as the accident occurred. However, the U.S. military frequently carried out take-off and landing flights after the request, and even ignored the matter at the press conference. This move caused anger and diplomatic disputes in Japan. The diplomacy of the two sides even started a fierce quarrel.
Judging by the attitude and diplomatic actions of the Japanese **, their anger and dissatisfaction can be clearly felt. To a certain extent, this incident has also become a diplomatic dispute between the United States and Japan. Behind the crash, the problems of the CV-22 "Osprey" rotorcraft used by the US military are highlighted. The aircraft has been involved in many accidents in the past 20 years, especially its complex tiltrotor design, which has brought great difficulty to operation and flight safety hazards.
Despite the unique tactical advantages of this design, in practice it was frequently problematic and left the impression of instability and unreliability. As can be seen from this incident, the frequent accidents of US military aircraft cannot help but raise questions about their design and safety performance. As an important diplomatic issue between the United States and Japan, we need to think about whether the two sides need to resolve this issue through other means than diplomatic representations
On the premise of ensuring security, can the two sides find a more effective way to cooperate?What do you think about this incident?