Everyone should be familiar with the Treaty of Nebuchu. Today we look at this treaty from a different perspective and from the point of view of the ** people. First of all, let's understand the situation in Heilongjiang before the signing of the treaty, and here is a statement of the historical data of the ** people.
Due to the influx of European immigrants, the peasant population in Yaksa (i.e., Albazin) increased rapidly. In Yaksa County, by 1684 (the twenty-third year of Kangxi, the second year of the Battle of Yaksa), there were 480 farmers and fishermen. These Albazins occupied almost all of the left bank of the Amur River, from the Strelka River to the mouth of the Huma River. They are scattered in various small villages, including Mikishkino, the Astrakhan Winter Grounds, the villages of Panovo, Ilyinsk and many others. In this area, the peasants ensured the rations of the Albazin Cossacks.
In the eyes of the ** people, the eastern boundary they control is the Niumanjiang River (known as the "Jieya River" in Russian), and the western boundary is the Shilka River, that is, the Nebuchu region. In this area, there are dozens of villages and nearly a thousand permanent populations, including 200 resident soldiers (Cossacks). This was already quite a large scale in the middle and upper reaches of Heilongjiang at that time. This area was known as the "Savage Jurchen" in the early Ming Dynasty, and the population was not large.
Before the outbreak of the Battle of Yaxa, the number of ** people in the middle and upper reaches of Heilongjiang was relatively large. If the Qing court does not take action, Heilongjiang may become the first sphere of influence. This is clearly not the outcome we want to see.
After the signing of the Treaty of Nebuchu, all the ** people east of the Ergun River were evacuated, except for the corpses buried in Yaxa, the ** people who were alive left this area. The person commented on this: "The glorious Albazin epic ended tragically, and the **man lost the Amur ...... for the third time."”
In general, in the eyes of the ** people, this treaty is unfair. And in our opinion, this treaty should be equal. In this regard, I will not repeat it.